Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

OR

FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-6622

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (301) 984-9400

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

YES x   NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

YES x   NO ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date, July 29, 2005.

SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST 42,123,032

1

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

INDEX

Part I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The information furnished in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statements of Income, Statements of Cash Flows and Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the three years ended December 31, 2004 included in the Trust’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“WRIT,” the “Company” or the “Trust”), a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust, is a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business consists of the ownership of income-producing real estate properties in the greater Washington – Baltimore region. We own a diversified portfolio of office buildings, industrial/flex properties, multifamily buildings and retail centers.

Federal Income Taxes

We believe we qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (i) reinvesting the sale price of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to the company or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders. All except approximately $3.5 million of gains on the sale of properties disposed during the first six months of 2005 were reinvested in replacement properties. Gains from the property disposed in 2004 were distributed to the shareholders.

NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Within these notes to the financial statements, we refer to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as the “2005 Quarter” and “2005 Period”, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as the “2004 Quarter” and “2004 Period”, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”). This Interpretation addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which the equity investors lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest or where the equity investment at risk is not sufficient for the entity to finance its activities without subordinated financial support from other parties. For entities identified as VIE, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding interests in VIE that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation No. 46 which modifies and clarifies various aspects of the original Interpretation. The adoption of this statement and of the revised interpretation did not have any impact on our financial condition or results of operations, as we do not have any variable interest entities as defined in FIN 46R.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). In particular, it requires that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments be classified as liabilities and reported at fair value and that changes in their fair values be reported as interest cost. SFAS No. 150 was effective for the company as of July 1, 2003. On October 29, 2003, the FASB indefinitely delayed the provision of the statement related to non-controlling interests in limited-life subsidiaries that are consolidated. Based on FASB’s deferral of this provision, adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not affect the company’s financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

In December, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB opinion No. 25 (APB25), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values and eliminates the intrinsic value method of accounting in APB25, which was permitted under SFAS No. 123, as originally issued. The revised statement requires entities to disclose information about the nature of the share-based payment transactions and the effects of those transactions on the financial statements. The provisions of this statement are effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. All public companies must use either the modified prospective or the modified retrospective transition method of adoption. On April 14, 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule that allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of our 2006 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the provisions of this revision to determine the impact on our consolidated financial statements. It is, however, expected to have some negative effect on consolidated net income.

Revenue Recognition

Residential properties (our Multifamily segment) are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less, and commercial properties (our Office, Retail and Industrial segments) are leased under operating leases with average terms of three to seven years. We recognize rental income and rental abatements from our residential and commercial leases when earned on a straight-line basis in accordance with SFAS No. 13 “Accounting for Leases.” We record a provision for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. This estimate is based on our historical experience and a review of the current status of the company’s receivables. Percentage rents, which represent additional rents based on gross tenant sales, are recognized when tenants’ sales exceed specified thresholds.

In accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” sales are recognized at closing only when sufficient down payments have been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and we have no significant continuing involvement.

We recognize cost reimbursement income from pass-through expenses on an accrual basis over the periods in which the expenses were incurred. Pass-through expenses are comprised of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance costs which are reimbursed by tenants in accordance with specific allowable costs per tenant lease agreements.

Minority Interest

We entered into an operating agreement with a member of the entity that previously owned Northern Virginia Industrial Park in conjunction with the acquisition of this property in May 1998. This resulted in a minority ownership interest in this property based upon defined company ownership units at the date of purchase. The operating agreement was amended and restated in 2002 resulting in a reduced minority ownership percentage interest. We account for this activity by allocating the minority owner’s percentage ownership interest of the net income of the property to minority interest included in our general and administrative expenses, thereby reducing net income. Minority interest expense was $36,700 and $82,500 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively, and $38,000 and $77,000 for the 2004 Quarter and the 2004 Period, respectively. Quarterly distributions are made to the minority owner equal to the quarterly dividend per share for each ownership unit.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs associated with the issuance of mortgage and other notes and fees associated with the lines of credit are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest rate method over the term of the related debt. The amortization is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The amortization of debt costs included in interest expense totaled $0.3 million for both the 2005 and 2004 Quarters and $0.6 million for both the 2005 and 2004 Periods.

8

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Deferred Leasing Costs

Costs associated with the successful negotiation of leases are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.

Real Estate and Depreciation

Buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 28 to 50 years. All capital improvement expenditures associated with replacements, improvements, or major repairs to real property that extend its useful life are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 30 years. All tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the term of the related tenant lease. Real estate depreciation expense for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period was $11.6 million and $21.0 million, respectively, and $8.5 million and $16.8 million for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred.

We capitalize interest costs recognized on borrowing obligations while qualifying assets are being readied for their intended use in accordance with SFAS No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost.” Total interest expense capitalized to real estate assets related to development and major renovation activities was $234,000 and $441,000 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively, and $254,000 and $332,000 for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively. Interest capitalized is amortized over the useful life of the related underlying assets upon those assets being placed into service.

We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to the estimated fair market value. There were no property impairments recognized during the 2005 and 2004 periods.

We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to the related physical assets and in-place leases based on their fair values, based on SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The fair values of acquired buildings are determined on an “as-if-vacant” basis considering a variety of factors, including the physical condition and quality of the buildings, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. The “as-if-vacant” fair value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on property tax assessments and other relevant information obtained in connection with the acquisition of the property.

The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components – (1) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant, foregone recovery of tenant pass-through expenses, tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “Tenant Origination Cost”); (2) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “Leasing Commissions”); (3) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as “Net Lease Intangible”); and (4) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determined based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the tenant (referred to as “Customer Relationship Value”).

The amounts used to calculate Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, and Net Lease Intangible are discounted using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. Tenant Origination Costs are included in Real Estate Assets on our balance sheet and are amortized as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Leasing Commissions are classified as Other Assets and are amortized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. The aggregate value of the cash flow for the above market leases results in Net Lease Intangible Assets which are classified as Other Assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis as a decrease to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. The aggregate value of the cash flow for the below market leases results in Net Lease Intangible Liabilities which are classified as Other Liabilities and are amortized on a straight-line basis as an increase to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. The aggregate value of the cash flow of leases at market results in no additional assets or liabilities.

9

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portions of the Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, and Net Lease Intangible associated with that lease are written off to depreciation expense, amortization expense, and rental revenue, respectively.

Balances net of accumulated depreciation or amortization, as appropriate, of the components of the fair value of in-place leases at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as follows (in millions):

Amortization of these components combined was $0.7 million for the 2005 Quarter and $1.5 million for the 2005 Period and $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively.

No value had been assigned to Customer Relationship Value at June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.

Discontinued Operations

We classify properties as held for sale when they meet the necessary criteria specified by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, (SFAS 144). These include: senior management commits to and actively embarks upon a plan to sell the assets, the sale is expected to be completed within one year under terms usual and customary for such sales and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued, but operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense continue to be recognized until the date of sale.

Under SFAS 144, revenues and expenses of properties that are either sold or classified as held for sale are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include investments readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash at June 30, 2005 consists of $3.5 million in funds escrowed from the sale of Tycon Plaza II, Tycon Plaza III and 7700 Leesburg Pike in February 2005 to be used solely for real estate acquisitions, and $0.8 million of escrow deposits required by lenders on certain of our properties to be used for future building renovations or tenant improvements. At December 31, 2004, restricted cash of $0.4 million consisted only of the lender required replacement reserves.

Stock Based Compensation

We maintain Share Grant Plans and Incentive Stock Option Plans (the “Plans”), which include qualified and non-qualified options and deferred shares for eligible employees.

Shares are granted to officers and trustees under the Share Grant Plans. Officer share grants vest over 5 years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. Trustee share grants are fully vested immediately upon date of share grant. We recognize compensation expense for share grants over the vesting period equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. The unvested portion of officer share grants is recognized as deferred compensation.

10

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Stock options were historically issued annually to officers, trustees and non-officer key employees under the Incentive Stock Option Plans. They were last issued to officers in 2002, to non-officer key employees in 2003 and to trustees in 2004. The options vest over a 2-year period in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant, except for trustee options which vested immediately upon the date of grant. Stock options are accounted for in accordance with APB 25, whereby if options are priced at fair market value or above at the date of grant and if other requirements are met then the plans are considered fixed and no compensation expense is recognized. Accordingly, we have recognized no compensation cost for stock options.

Had we determined compensation cost for the Plans consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro-forma amounts (in thousands, except per share data):

Earnings Per Common Share

We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” “Basic earnings per share” is computed as net income divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. “Diluted earnings per share” is computed as net income divided by the total weighted-average common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares reflect the assumed issuance of additional common shares pursuant to certain of our share based compensation plans that could potentially reduce or “dilute” earnings per share, based on the treasury stock method.

Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

11

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Our real estate investment portfolio, at cost, consists of properties located in Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia as follows (in thousands):

The amounts above reflect properties classified as continuing operations, which means they are to be held and used in rental operations or are currently in development. We dispose of assets (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) that are inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives or where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be redeployed into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders. Properties are considered held for sale when they meet the criteria specified by SFAS No. 144 (see Note 2 – Discontinued Operations). Depreciation on these properties is discontinued at that time, but operating revenues, other operating expenses and interest continue to be recognized until the date of sale.

We had no properties classified as held for sale during the 2005 period, and three held for sale at December 31, 2004 as follows (in thousands):

Our results of operations are dependent on the overall economic health of our markets, tenants and the specific segments in which we own properties. These segments include commercial office, retail, multifamily and industrial. All sectors are affected by external economic factors, such as inflation, consumer confidence, unemployment rates, etc., as well as by changing tenant and consumer requirements.

WRIT acquired the following properties during the 2005 Period:

We accounted for these acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. As discussed in Note 2, we allocate the purchase price to the related physical assets (land, building and tenant improvements) and in-place leases (tenant origination costs, leasing commissions, and net lease intangible assets/liabilities) based on their fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Our acquisitions of Frederick Crossing and the Coleman Building resulted in the recognition of $1.7 million in tenant origination costs, $0.9 million in leasing commissions, $65,000 in net intangible lease assets, and $3.4 million in net intangible lease liabilities. The results of operations from these acquired properties are included in the income statement as of their respective acquisition date and forward.

WRIT sold the following properties during the 2005 Period:

12

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

The above properties, classified as discontinued operations effective November 2004, were sold to a single buyer for a $67.5 million contract sales price on February 1, 2005. WRIT recognized a gain on disposal of $32.1 million, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” $31.3 million of the proceeds from the disposition were escrowed in a tax-free property exchange account and subsequently used to fund a portion of the purchase price of Frederick Crossing Shopping Center on March 23, 2005 and the Coleman Building on April 8, 2005. $31.0 million of the proceeds were used to pay down $31.0 million outstanding under Credit Facility No. 2. Discontinued operations for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period consist of the properties sold in February 2005. For the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, discontinued operations include those same properties and 8230 Boone Boulevard, which was sold on November 15, 2004. In addition there was a gain of $1.9 million recognized in the 2005 Quarter previously deferred from the sale of Boone Boulevard.

Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Other Income from Property Settlement

In the 2005 quarter we received the final proceeds as compensation for an action by the Maryland State Highway Administration. Curb access to one of our retail properties was closed to the detriment of tenant delivery vehicles. After independent appraisals and engineering studies the state compensated WRIT for this loss of use. The total amount of this compensation was $543,000 and the other income (net of legal, engineering and other professional fees) recorded was $504,000.

13

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 4: MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

Total carrying amount of the above mortgaged properties was $336.2 million and $282.0 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

14

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Scheduled principal payments for the remaining six months in 2005 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 5: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE

As of June 30, 2005, we maintained an $85.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2007 (“Credit Facility No.1”) and a $50.0 million line of credit maturing in July 2005 (“Credit Facility No. 2”).

Credit Facility No. 1

We had no balance outstanding as of June 30, 2005 related to Credit Facility No. 1, with $85.0 million unused and available for subsequent acquisitions or capital improvements. At December 31, 2004, $67.0 million was outstanding under this facility. Advances under this agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in July 2007. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. We incurred $162,900 and $687,400 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 3.43% and 3.20% respectively, per annum. We incurred $59,900 and $72,200 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 1.79% and 1.78%, respectively, per annum. In April 2005, we paid in full the outstanding balance under Credit Facility No. 1 using a portion of the proceeds from the April 2005 issuance of $50.0 million of seven-year, 5.05% unsecured notes and $50.0 million of ten-year, 5.35% unsecured notes (See Note 6 – Notes Payable).

From July 2002 through July 20, 2004, Credit Facility No. 1 had a maximum available commitment of $25.0 million and required us to pay the lender unused line of credit fees ranging from 0.225% to 0.400% per annum according to a sliding scale based on usage and the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. These fees were payable quarterly. We incurred unused commitment fees of $6,600 and $27,700, for the 2004 Quarter, and 2004 Period, respectively.

On July 21, 2004, we closed on a new $50.0 million line of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, replacing the former $25.0 million facility. On November 10, 2004, we amended the Credit Agreement to increase the maximum available commitment from $50.0 million to $85.0 million. The new Credit Facility No. 1 requires us to pay the lender a facility fee on the total commitment ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. These fees are payable quarterly. We incurred facility fees of $33,800 and $66,000, for the 2005 Quarter, and 2005 Period, respectively.

Credit Facility No. 2

We had no balance outstanding as of June 30, 2005 related to Credit Facility No. 2 with $50.0 million unused and available for subsequent acquisitions or capital improvements. At December 31, 2004, $50.0 million was outstanding under this facility. Advances under this agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread or an advance can be converted into a term loan based upon a Treasury rate plus a spread. All outstanding advances were due and payable upon maturity in July 2005. Interest only payments were due and payable generally on a monthly basis. We incurred $54,600 and $304,000 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) for 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively, representing an average interest rate of 3.57% and 3.28%, respectively, per annum and no interest expense (excluding facility fees) for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period.

15

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Credit Facility No. 2 required us to pay the lender unused line of credit fees ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. The fee is paid quarterly in arrears. We incurred unused commitment fees of $22,200 and $31,700, for the 2005 Quarter, and 2005 Period, respectively, and $25,300 and $50,800, for the 2004 Quarter, and 2004 Period, respectively.

In February 2005, we repaid $31.0 million outstanding under Credit Facility No. 2 using a portion of the $67.5 million proceeds from the disposition of 7700 Leesburg, Tycon Plaza II and Tycon Plaza III. In April 2005, we repaid the remaining outstanding balance under Credit Facility No. 2 using a portion of the proceeds from the April 2005 issuance of $50.0 million of seven-year, 5.05% unsecured notes and $50.0 million of ten-year, 5.35% unsecured notes (See Note 6 – Notes Payable).

On July 25, 2005 we renewed Credit Facility No. 2, extending its maturity date to July 25, 2008, and increasing the maximum available commitment to $70.0 million. This renewal and extension included a carve-out for letters of credit in the amount of $14.0 million associated with current development projects. The New Credit Facility No. 2 requires us to pay the lender an annual facility fee on the total commitment ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. These fees are payable quarterly. Advances under this agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in July 2008. Interest only payments are due and payable on a monthly basis.

Credit Facility No. 1 and No. 2 contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have met as of June 30, 2005. In addition, Credit Facility No. 1 requires approval to be obtained from the lender for purchases by the Trust over an agreed upon amount.

NOTE 6: NOTES PAYABLE

On August 13, 1996 we sold $50.0 million of 7.125% 7-year unsecured notes due August 13, 2003, and $50.0 million of 7.25% unsecured 10-year notes due August 13, 2006. The 7-year notes were sold at 99.107% of par and the 10-year notes were sold at 98.166% of par. Net proceeds to the Trust after deducting underwriting expenses were $97.6 million. The 7-year notes, which we paid off at maturity in August 2003 with an advance under Credit Facility No. 2, bore an effective interest rate of 7.46%. The 10-year notes due in August 2006 bear an effective interest rate of 7.49%.

On February 20, 1998 we sold $50.0 million of 7.25% unsecured notes due February 25, 2028 at 98.653% to yield approximately 7.36%. We also sold $60.0 million in unsecured Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (“MOPPRS”) at an effective borrowing rate through the remarketing date (February 2008) of approximately 6.74%. Our costs of the borrowings and related closed hedge settlements of approximately $7.2 million are amortized over the lives of the notes using the effective interest method. These notes do not require any principal payment and are due in full at maturity.

On November 6, 2000 we sold $55.0 million of 7.78% unsecured notes due November 2004. The notes bore an effective interest rate of 7.89%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $54.8 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit. We paid off the notes on November 15, 2004, with a $50.0 million advance under Credit Facility No. 2 and a $7.0 million advance under Credit Facility No. 1.

On March 17, 2003, we sold $60.0 million of 5.125% unsecured notes due March 2013. The notes bear an effective interest rate of 5.23%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $59.1 million. We used portions of the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.

On December 11, 2003, we sold $100.0 million of 5.25% unsecured notes due January 2014. The notes bear an effective interest rate of 5.34%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $99.3 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit.

On April 26, 2005, we sold $50.0 million of 5.05% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2012 and $50.0 million of 5.35% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2015, at effective yields of 5.064% and 5.359% respectively. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $99.3 million were used to repay borrowings under our lines of credit totaling $90.5 million and the remainder may be used for the acquisition of real estate and general corporate purposes.

These notes contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have met as of June 30, 2005.

16

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

The covenants under one of the line of credit agreements require us to insure our properties against loss or damage in the amount of the replacement cost of the improvements at the properties. The covenants for the notes require us to keep all of our insurable properties insured against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value. We have a separate insurance policy which provides terrorism coverage; however, our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts. Effective November 26, 2002, under this existing coverage, any losses caused by certified acts of terrorism would be partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula established by Federal law. Under this formula the United States pays 90% of covered terrorism losses exceeding the statutorily established deductible paid by the insurance provider. If the aggregate amount of insured losses under the Act exceeds $100 billion during the applicable period for all insured and insurers combined, then each insurance provider will not be liable for payment of any amount which exceeds the aggregate amount of $100 billion. This current legislation expires in November 2005.

Scheduled maturity dates of the securities for the remaining six months in 2005 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 7: BENEFIT PLANS

Share Options and Grants

We maintain Incentive Stock Option Plans (the “Plans”), which include qualified and non-qualified options. In 2003 the Board approved a change in the composition of officer share options and share grant awards. Officers no longer receive annual share option awards. Effective 2003, annual incentive compensation is awarded at the same percentage of cash compensation as in prior years except it is in the form of share grants only.

We maintain a Share Grant Plan for officers and trustees. At the approval of the Board, the Share Grant Plan was changed in 2003 so that Managing Directors received an award of shares with a market value of 25% of the individual’s cash compensation (45% for the Chief Executive Officer, 37% for Executive Vice Presidents, and 35% for Senior Vice Presidents) at the date of the award. Beginning in 2003, officers received annual awards of share grants only (as opposed to share options and share grants) in an amount such that the total annual incentive compensation as a percentage of officer cash compensation remained unchanged. Each Trustee received an annual grant of 400 unrestricted shares under the plan.

In November 2004, the Board of Trustees approved an amended short-term and long-term incentive plan for officers and executives. The first cash benefits under the amended short-term plan will be paid in late 2005, and the first restricted stock grants under the amended long-term plan will be made in 2006, in each case based upon 2005 results. The short-term incentive compensation plan provides for the annual payment of cash bonuses based upon WRIT’s achievement of its annual targets for funds from operations (FFO) per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) and EBITDA as defined by the revised plan (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Each target will be determined in November of the preceding year by management and approved by the Board of Trustees. The long-term incentive plan provides for the annual grant of restricted WRIT shares based on WRIT’s five-year rolling average total shareholder return compared to a weighted-average peer group. The awards will be granted in the form of restricted shares pursuant to WRIT’s existing share grant plan, will vest ratably over a five-year period from the date of grant and will not be permitted to be sold until the entire award has vested.

Also in November 2004, the Board of Trustees approved revisions to the trustee compensation plan, under which the first cash and share grant benefits will be paid in 2005. Under this plan, annual long-term incentive compensation for trustees is changed from options of 2,000 shares plus 400 restricted shares to $30,000 in restricted shares. These restricted shares will vest immediately and will be restricted from sale for the period of the Trustees’ service. Additionally, the amounts of certain fees and retainers were amended.

17

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

Other Benefit Plans

We have a Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which permits all eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, the company may make discretionary contributions on behalf of eligible employees. For the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, the company made contributions to the 401(k) plan of $77,000 and $146,000, respectively. For the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, the company made contributions to the 401(k) plan of $69,000 and $136,000, respectively.

We adopted a split dollar life insurance plan for executive officers (the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Real Estate and Senior Vice President Accounting and Administration) and other company officers, excluding the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), in 2000. The purpose of the plan is to provide these officers with financial security in exchange for a career commitment. It is intended that we will recover our costs from the life insurance policies at death prior to retirement, termination prior to retirement or retirement at age 65. It is intended that the officers can use the cash values of the policy in excess of the Trust’s interest. The Trust has a security interest in the cash value and death benefit of each policy to the extent of the sum of premium payments we have made. Subsequent to July 2002 we discontinued premium advances under this plan for the benefit of executive officers. The company paid premiums for non executive company officers of $0.0 million and $0.2 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively.

We have adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the officers and members of the Board of Trustees. The plan allows for a deferral of a percentage of annual cash compensation and trustee fees. The plan is unfunded and payments are to be made out of the general assets of the Trust. The deferred compensation liability was $1.5 million and $1.3 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

We established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) effective July 1, 2002 for the benefit of the CEO. Upon the CEO’s termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than death, discharge for cause or total and permanent disability, the CEO will be entitled to receive an annual benefit equal to his accrued benefit times his vested interest. We account for the SERP in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” whereby we accrue benefit cost in an amount that will result in an accrued balance at the end of the CEO’s employment which is not less than the present value of the estimated benefit payments to be made. We recognized current service cost for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Periods, of $102,000 and $203,000, respectively, and $91,000 and $172,000 for the 2004 Quarter and 2004 Period, respectively.

18

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 8: EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per average share and diluted average shares (in thousands, except per share data):

NOTE 9: SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have four reportable segments: Office Buildings, Retail Centers, Multifamily Properties and Industrial/Flex Centers. Office Buildings, which include medical office buildings, provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Retail Centers are typically neighborhood grocery store or drug store anchored retail centers. Multifamily Properties provide housing for families throughout the Washington Metropolitan area. Industrial/Flex Centers are used for flex-office, warehousing and distribution type facilities.

Real estate revenue as a percentage of total revenue for each of the four reportable operating segments is as follows:

Real estate assets as a percentage of total assets for each of the four reportable operating segments are as follows:

19

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(UNAUDITED)

The accounting policies of each of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. We evaluate performance based upon operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable segments are consolidations of similar properties. They are managed separately because each segment requires different operating, pricing and leasing strategies. All of these properties have been acquired separately and are incorporated into the applicable segment.

Segment Information (in thousands):