Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

OR

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

Commission File Number: 1-6622

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (301) 984-9400

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check One):

Large Accelerated Filer x                                         Accelerated Filer ¨                                         Non-Accelerated Filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO x

Number of shares outstanding of common stock, as of July 31, 2006: 44,997,021

1

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

INDEX

Part I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statements of Income, Statements of Cash Flows and Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the three years ended December 31, 2005 included in the Trust’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“WRIT,” the “Company” or the “Trust”), a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust, is a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business consists of the ownership and development of income-producing real estate properties in the greater Washington – Baltimore region. We own a diversified portfolio of general purpose office buildings, medical office buildings, industrial/flex properties, multifamily properties and retail centers.

Federal Income Taxes

We believe that we qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (i) reinvesting the sale price of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to the company or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders. No properties were sold in the first six months of 2006 and all of the gains on the sale of properties in 2005 were reinvested in replacement properties.

NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Within these notes to the financial statements, we refer to the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as the “2006 Quarter” and “2006 Period”, respectively, and the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 as the “2005 Quarter” and “2005 Period”, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Statement No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values and eliminates the intrinsic value method of accounting in APB No. 25, which was permitted under SFAS No. 123, as originally issued. The Company has applied the provisions of this statement as of January 1, 2006.

Since we used the fair-value-based method of accounting under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, in pro forma disclosure, we were required to adopt the provisions of the new standard using either the modified-prospective-transition or the modified-retrospective-transition method. Under both methods, for awards granted, settled or modified subsequent to adopting the standard and for awards granted prior to the date of adoption for which the requisite service has not been completed as of the adoption date, compensation cost must be recognized in the financial statements. Under the modified-retrospective- method, financial statements for prior periods are restated for this change and under the modified prospective method only statements subsequent to adoption will include this compensation cost. The modified-prospective-method also requires a cumulative adjustment in the first period of adoption to conform to the new standard. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified-prospective-transition method and that adoption did not have a material impact on income from continuing operations, net income, cash flows from operations or financing activities , or basic and diluted EPS.

7

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”). FIN No. 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and it seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of measurement and recognition in accounting for income taxes. In addition, FIN No. 48 requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes and is effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FIN No. 48 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Residential properties (our multifamily segment) are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less, and commercial properties (our office, medical office, retail and industrial segments) are leased under operating leases with average terms of three to seven years. We recognize rental income and rental abatements from our residential and commercial leases when earned on a straight-line basis in accordance with SFAS No. 13 “Accounting for Leases.” Recognition of rental income commences when control of the facility has been given to the tenant. We record a provision for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. This estimate is based on our historical experience and a review of the current status of the company’s receivables. Percentage rents, which represent additional rents based on gross tenant sales, are recognized when tenants’ sales exceed specified thresholds.

In accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” sales are recognized at closing only when sufficient down payments have been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and we have no significant continuing involvement.

We recognize cost reimbursement income from pass-through expenses on an accrual basis over the periods in which the expenses were incurred. Pass-through expenses are comprised of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance costs which are reimbursed by tenants in accordance with specific allowable costs per tenant lease agreements.

Minority Interest

We entered into an operating agreement with a member of the entity that previously owned Northern Virginia Industrial Park in conjunction with the acquisition of this property in May 1998. This resulted in a minority ownership interest in this property based upon defined company ownership units at the date of purchase. The operating agreement was amended and restated in 2002 resulting in a reduced minority ownership percentage interest. We account for this activity by allocating the minority owner’s percentage ownership interest of the net income of the property to minority interest included in our general and administrative expenses, thereby reducing net income. Minority interest expense was $46,200 and $96,200 for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively and $36,700 and $82,500 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively. Quarterly distributions are made to the minority owner equal to the quarterly dividend per share for each ownership unit.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs associated with the issuance of mortgage and other notes and fees associated with the lines of credit are capitalized and amortized using the effective interest rate method or the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest rate method over the term of the related debt. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, deferred financing costs of $12.1 million and $11.1 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $5.3 million and $4.6 million were included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets on the balance sheets. The amortization is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The amortization of debt costs included in interest expense totaled $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively and $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively.

Deferred Leasing Costs

Costs associated with the successful negotiation of leases, both external commissions and internal direct costs, are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. If an applicable lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial lease term, the carrying amount of the costs are written-off to expense. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 deferred leasing costs of $17.2 million and $15.1 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $5.8 million and $4.9 million, were included in Prepaid and Other Assets on the balance sheets. The amortization of deferred

8

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

leasing costs included in expense for properties classified as continuing operations totaled $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively.

Real Estate and Depreciation

Buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 28 to 50 years. All capital improvement expenditures associated with replacements, improvements, or major repairs to real property that extend its useful life are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 30 years. We also capitalize costs incurred in connection with our development projects, including capitalizing interest during periods in which development projects are in progress. In addition, we capitalize tenant leasehold improvements when certain criteria are met, including when we supervise construction and will own the improvements. All tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the term of the related tenant lease. Real estate depreciation expense for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period was $11.4 million and $22.1 million, respectively, and $11.5 million and $20.9 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred.

We capitalize interest costs recognized on borrowing obligations while qualifying assets are being readied for their intended use in accordance with SFAS No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost.” Total interest expense capitalized to real estate assets related to development and major renovation activities was $769,200 and $1,470,400 for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively, and $234,000 and $441,000 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively. Interest capitalized is depreciated over the useful life of the related underlying assets when those assets are placed into service upon completion of development or construction.

We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations if indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to the estimated fair market value. There were no property impairments recognized during the 2006 and 2005 Periods.

We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to the related physical assets and in-place leases based on their fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The fair values of acquired buildings are determined on an “as-if-vacant” basis considering a variety of factors, including the physical condition and quality of the buildings, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. The “as-if-vacant” fair value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on property tax assessments and other relevant information obtained in connection with the acquisition of the property.

The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components – (1) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant, foregone recovery of tenant pass-through expenses, tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “Tenant Origination Cost”); (2) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “Leasing Commissions”); (3) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as “Net Lease Intangible”); and (4) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determined based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the tenant (referred to as “Customer Relationship Value”).

The amounts used to calculate Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, and Net Lease Intangible are discounted using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. Tenant Origination Costs are included in Real Estate Assets on our balance sheet and are amortized as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Leasing Commissions are classified as Other Assets and are amortized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Assets are classified as Other Assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis as a decrease to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Net Lease Intangible Liabilities are classified as Other Liabilities and are amortized on a straight-line basis as an increase to Real Estate Rental Revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portions of the Tenant Origination Cost, Leasing Commissions, and Net Lease Intangible associated with that lease are written off to depreciation expense, amortization expense, and rental revenue, respectively.

9

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

Balances net of accumulated depreciation or amortization, as appropriate, of the components of the fair value of in-place leases at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are as follows (in millions):

Amortization of these components combined was $0.8 million for the 2006 Quarter and $1.6 million for the 2006 Period and $0.7 million and $1.5 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively. No value had been assigned to Customer Relationship Value at June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.

Discontinued Operations

We classify properties as held for sale when they meet the necessary criteria specified by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. These criteria include: senior management commits to and actively embarks upon a plan to sell the assets, the sale is expected to be completed within one year under terms usual and customary for such sales, and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued, but operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense continue to be recognized until the date of sale.

Under SFAS No. 144, revenues and expenses of properties that are either sold or classified as held for sale are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include investments readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consisted of $2.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in funds escrowed for tenant security deposits, real estate tax, insurance and mortgage escrows and escrow deposits required by lenders on certain of our properties to be used for future building renovations or tenant improvements.

Stock Based Compensation

We maintain Share Grant Plans and Incentive Stock Option Plans as described in Note 7, Share Options and Grants, which include qualified and non-qualified options and deferred shares for eligible employees. Shares are granted to officers, non-officer key employees and trustees under the Share Grant Plans. Officer and non-officer key employee share grants vest over three or five years in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. Trustee share grants are fully vested immediately upon date of share grant and are restricted from sale for the period of the Trustees’ service.

Compensation expense is recognized for share grants over the vesting period equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. Compensation expense for the trustee grants is fully recognized upon issuance based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The unvested portion of officer and non-officer key employee share grants is recognized in compensation cost ratably over the vesting period.

Unvested shares are forfeited upon an employee’s termination while unvested shares for employees eligible for retirement fully vest upon retirement. For shares granted to employees who are eligible for retirement or will become eligible for retirement during the vesting period, compensation cost is recognized over the explicit service period with acceleration of expense upon the date of actual retirement for these employees. The Company will continue this practice for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, when FAS 123(R) was adopted, and for shares granted after the adoption of FAS 123(R) the Company will recognize

10

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

compensation expense through the date that the employee is no longer required to provide service to earn the award (e.g. the date the employee is eligible to retire).

Stock options were historically issued annually to officers, trustees and non-officer key employees under the Incentive Stock Option Plans. They were last issued to officers in 2002, to non-officer key employees in 2003 and to trustees in 2004. The options vested over a two year period in annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant, except for trustee options which vested immediately upon the date of grant. Stock options were accounted for in accordance with APB No. 25, whereby if options are priced at fair market value or above at the date of grant and if other requirements are met then the plans are considered fixed and no compensation expense is recognized. Accordingly, we recognized no compensation cost for stock options.

Had we determined compensation cost prior to January 1, 2006, for the Plans consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro-forma amounts (in thousands, except per share data):

Earnings per Common Share

We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” “Basic earnings per share” is computed as net income divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. “Diluted earnings per share” is computed as net income divided by the total weighted-average common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares reflect the assumed issuance of additional common shares pursuant to certain of our share based compensation plans that could potentially reduce or “dilute” earnings per share, based on the treasury stock method.

Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

11

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Our real estate investment portfolio, at cost, consists of properties located in Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia as follows (in thousands):

The amounts above reflect properties classified as continuing operations, which means they are to be held and used in rental operations (income producing property) or are currently in development. We dispose of assets (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) that are inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives and when market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be redeployed into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders. Properties are considered held for sale when they meet the criteria specified by SFAS No. 144 (see Note 2 – Discontinued Operations). Depreciation on these properties is discontinued at that time, but operating revenues, other operating expenses and interest continue to be recognized until the date of sale. We had one property classified as held for sale at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 as follows (in thousands):

Our results of operations are dependent on the overall economic health of our markets, tenants and the specific segments in which we own properties. These segments include commercial office, medical office, retail, multifamily and industrial. All sectors are affected by external economic factors, such as inflation, consumer confidence, unemployment rates, etc., as well as by changing tenant and consumer requirements.

WRIT acquired the following properties during the 2006 Period:

We accounted for these acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting. As discussed in Note 2, we allocate the purchase price to the related physical assets (land, building and tenant improvements) and in-place leases (tenant origination costs, leasing commissions, and net lease intangible assets/liabilities) based on their fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Our acquisition of the above nine properties resulted in the recognition of $3.1 million in tenant origination costs, $1.0 million in leasing commissions, $1.7 million in net intangible lease assets, and $1.8 million in net intangible lease liabilities. The results of operations from these acquired properties are included in the income statement as of their respective acquisition date and forward.

12

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

The following unaudited pro-forma combined condensed statements of operations present the consolidated results of operations for the 2006 Quarter and Period and the 2005 Quarter and Period, as if the above described acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the period of acquisition and the same period in the year prior to the acquisition. The unaudited pro-forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been in effect for the Quarters and Periods presented. The unaudited data presented is in thousands, except per share data.

WRIT had one property held for sale, the Lexington office building with approximately 46,000 rentable square feet, and classified as discontinued operations in the 2006 Period. Discontinued operations for the 2005 Period consisted of the Lexington building and the following dispositions from 2005:

The office properties, classified as discontinued operations effective November 2004, were sold to a single buyer for a $67.5 million contract sales price on February 1, 2005. WRIT recognized a gain on disposal of $32.1 million, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” We escrowed $31.3 million of the proceeds from the disposition in a tax-free property exchange account and subsequently used that to fund a portion of the purchase price of Frederick Crossing Shopping Center on March 23, 2005 and the Coleman Building on April 8, 2005. We used $31.0 million of the proceeds to pay down $31.0 million outstanding under Credit Facility No. 2. In September 2005 the industrial property was sold for $6.0 million for a gain of $3.0 million. Proceeds of $5.8 million were escrowed in a tax-free exchange account.

Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Operating income by property is summarized below (in thousands):

13

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 4: MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

14

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

Total carrying amount of the above mortgaged properties was $314.6 million and $289.4 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Scheduled principal payments for the remaining six months in 2006 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 5: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE

As of June 30, 2006, we maintained an $85.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2007 (“Credit Facility No. 1”) and a $70.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2008 (“Credit Facility No. 2”).

Credit Facility No. 1

We had $0.0 million outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and at December 31, 2005 related to Credit Facility No. 1, with $0.9 million in a Letter of Credit issued and $84.1 million unused and available for subsequent acquisitions or capital improvements. Acquisition related borrowings during the 2006 Quarter totaled $84.0 million, including $28.0 million in May 2006 to partially fund the Randolph and Montrose Shopping Centers and in April, $25.0 million to partially fund Alexandria Professional Center, $21.0 million for 15001 Shady Grove Road and $10.0 million for 9707 Medical Center Drive. These borrowings were paid in full on June 6, 2006 using a portion of the proceeds from the June 2006 public offering of 2.745 million common shares of beneficial interest and the June 2006 issuance of $100.0 million five-year 5.95% unsecured notes (See Note 6 – Notes Payable). Advances under this agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit ratings of our publicly issued debt. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in July 2007. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. We incurred $554,900 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, representing an average interest rate of 5.57%, per annum. For the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, we incurred $162,900 and $687,400 in interest expense (excluding facility fees), respectively, representing an average interest rate of 3.43% and 3.20%, respectively, per annum.

Credit Facility No. 1 requires us to pay the lender a facility fee on the total commitment ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit rating of our publicly issued debt. These fees are payable quarterly. We incurred facility fees of $32,200 and $63,800 for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively. For the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, we incurred facility fees of $33,800 and $66,000, respectively.

Credit Facility No. 2

We had $19.0 million outstanding as of June 30, 2006 related to Credit Facility No. 2, and $1.1 million in Letters of Credit issued, with $49.9 million unused and available for subsequent acquisitions or capital improvements. The maximum allowable borrowing on this facility was raised from $70.0 million to $102.0 million from May 15, 2006 through June 15, 2006 to accommodate acquisition related borrowings during the quarter, which included $22.5 million in May to partially fund Randolph and Montrose Shopping Centers, $12.0 million in May for 9950 Business Parkway and $2.0 million in April to partially fund Alexandria Professional Center. An additional $24.0 million was borrowed during the quarter to fund development costs, certain capital improvements to real estate and acquisition related due diligence costs, of which $19.0 million was outstanding at June 30, 2006. $100.5 million in borrowings from October of 2005 through May 2006 were paid in full on June 6, 2006 using a portion of the proceeds from the June 2006 public offering of 2.745 million common shares of beneficial interest and the June 2006 issuance of $100.0 million five-year 5.95% unsecured notes (See Note 6 – Notes Payable). At December 31, 2005, $24.0 million was outstanding under this facility. Advances under this agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in July 2008. Interest only payments are due and payable on a monthly basis. We incurred $748,800 and $1,241,700 in interest expense (excluding facility fees) for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively, representing an

15

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

average interest rate of 5.49% and 5.33%, respectively, per annum. For the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, we incurred $54,600 and $304,000 in interest expense (excluding facility fees), respectively, representing an average interest rate of 3.57% and 3.28%, respectively, per annum.

Before its renewal in July 2005, Credit Facility No. 2 required us to pay the lender unused line of credit fees ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit rating of our publicly issued debt. The fee was paid quarterly in arrears. We incurred unused commitment fees of $22,200 and $31,700 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively.

On July 25, 2005 we renewed Credit Facility No. 2, extending its maturity date to July 25, 2008, and increasing the maximum available commitment to $70.0 million. This renewal and extension included a carve-out for letters of credit in the amount of $14.0 million. Credit Facility No. 2 requires us to pay the lender an annual facility fee on the total commitment ranging from 0.15% to 0.25% per annum according to a sliding scale based on the credit ratings of our publicly issued debt. These fees are payable quarterly. We incurred $30,000 and $56,300 in facility fees for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively.

Credit Facility No. 1 and No. 2 contain certain financial and non-financial covenants. In addition, Credit Facility No. 1 requires approval to be obtained from the lender for purchases by the Trust over an agreed upon amount. Effective as of June 30, 2006, we amended Credit Facility No. 1, to revise the financial covenant ratio of the value of unencumbered assets to consolidated unsecured indebtedness (as defined in the agreement) from 1.82 to 1.67 and the ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to total capitalization (as defined in the agreement) from 55% to 60%. Accordingly, all covenants under Credit Facility No. 1 and No. 2 have been met as of June 30, 2006.

NOTE 6: NOTES PAYABLE

On August 13, 1996 we sold $50.0 million of 7.25% unsecured 10-year notes due August 13, 2006 at 98.166% of par resulting in an effective interest rate of 7.49%. Net proceeds to the Trust after deducting underwriting expenses were $48.8 million.

On February 20, 1998 we sold $50.0 million of 7.25% unsecured notes due February 25, 2028 at 98.653% to yield approximately 7.36%. We also sold $60.0 million in unsecured Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities (“MOPPRS”) at a price of 101.2% of par and an effective borrowing rate through the remarketing date (February 2008) of approximately 6.74%. Our costs of the borrowings and related closed hedge settlements of approximately $7.2 million are amortized over the lives of the notes using the effective interest method. These notes do not require any principal payment and are due in full at maturity.

On March 17, 2003, we sold $60.0 million of 5.125% unsecured notes due March 2013 at an issue price of 99.599% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.23%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $59.1 million. We used portions of the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.

On December 11, 2003, we sold $100.0 million of 5.25% unsecured notes due January 2014 at an issue price of 99.985% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.34%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $99.3 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on our lines of credit.

On April 26, 2005, we sold $50.0 million of 5.05% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2012 and $50.0 million of 5.35% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2015, at effective yields of 5.064% and 5.359% respectively. The notes were sold at an issue price of 99.917% and 99.930% of par, respectively. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $99.1 million were used to repay borrowings under our lines of credit totaling $90.5 million and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes.

In October 2005 we issued an additional $100.0 million of notes of the series of 5.35% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2015 at a price of 98.942% of par, resulting in an effective yield of 5.49%. We used $93.5 million of the $98.1 million net proceeds from the sale of these notes to repay borrowings under our lines of credit and to fund general corporate purposes.

On June 6, 2006, we sold $100.0 million of 5.95% unsecured notes due June 15, 2011 at an issue price of 99.951% of par, resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.96%. Our total proceeds, net of underwriting fees, were $99.4 million. We used the proceeds of these notes to repay advances on one of our lines of credit.

16

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of our unsecured note borrowings (in thousands):

The required principal payments excluding the effects of note discounts or premium for the remaining six months in 2006 and the remaining years subsequent to December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually. They contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have met as of June 30, 2006.

The covenants under one of the line of credit agreements require us to insure our properties against loss or damage in the amount of the replacement cost of the improvements at the properties. The covenants for the notes require us to keep all of our insurable properties insured against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value. We have a separate insurance policy which provides terrorism coverage; however, our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts. Effective November 26, 2002, under this existing coverage, any losses caused by certified acts of terrorism would be partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula established by Federal law. Under this formula the United States pays 90% of covered terrorism losses exceeding the statutorily established deductible paid by the insurance provider, and insurers pay 10% until aggregate insured losses from all insurers reach $100 billion in a calendar year. If the aggregate amount of insured losses under the Act exceeds $100 billion during the applicable period for all insured and insurers combined, then each insurance provider will not be liable for payment of any amount which exceeds the aggregate amount of $100 billion. This legislation, originally scheduled to expire on December 31, 2005, was extended through December 31, 2007, with the enactment of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2005. With the extension, the Federal share of compensation for insured losses decreases to 85% in 2007.

NOTE 7: BENEFIT PLANS

Share Options and Grants

We have historically maintained Incentive Stock Option Plans (the “Plans”), which included qualified and non-qualified options. In 2003 the Board approved a change in the composition of officer share options and share grant awards such that annual incentive compensation is awarded at the same percentage of cash compensation as in prior years except it is in the form of share grants only. The last option awards to Officers were in 2003 and to Trustees in 2004 and all such options were vested as of December 31, 2005. Effective 2005 officers and Trustees receive annual share grant awards only.

17

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

We adopted the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2001 Stock Option Plan (“New Stock Option Plan”) to replace the 1991 Stock Option Plan (“Stock Option Plan”) that expired on June 25, 2001. Under the Plans, options, which were issued at market price on the date of grant, vested 50% after year one and 50% after year two and expire ten years following the date of grant. We adopted the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Stock Option Plan for Trustees in March 1998. Options granted to trustees were fully vested on the grant date. Activity under the Plans is summarized below:

The 492,000 options outstanding at June 30, 2006, all of which are exercisable, have exercise prices between $14.47 and $33.09, with a weighted-average exercise price of $24.34 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.6 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding exercisable shares at June 30, 2006 was $6.1 million.

In November 2004, the Board of Trustees approved an amended short-term and long-term incentive plan for officers and non-officer key employees. The first benefits under the amended short-term and long term plan were paid in late 2005, and the first share grants under the amended long-term plan were made in February 2006. The short-term incentive compensation plan provides for the annual payment of cash bonuses based upon WRIT’s achievement of its annual targets for Funds From Operations (FFO) per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) and EBITDA as defined by the revised plan (a non-GAAP measure calculated as earnings before interest income and expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and gains on sale of real estate). Each target will be determined in November of the preceding year by management and approved by the Board of Trustees. The long-term incentive plan provides for the annual grant of restricted WRIT shares based on WRIT’s total shareholder return compared to a benchmark or index appropriate to the industry. Shares granted to officers and non-officer key employees under the Share Grant Plan vest 20% per year over five years and are restricted from transfer for five years from the date of grant. Prior to 2004, each Trustee received an annual grant of 400 unrestricted shares under the trustee compensation plan. In November 2004, the Board of Trustees approved revisions to the trustee compensation plan, under which the first cash and share grant benefits were paid in 2005. Under this plan, annual long-term incentive compensation for trustees is changed from options for 2,000 shares plus 400 restricted shares to $30,000 in restricted shares. These restricted shares will vest immediately and are restricted from sale for the period of the Trustees’ service. Additionally, the amounts of certain director fees and retainers were amended.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2006 we issued 64,700 share grants under the long-term incentive plan to our officers. We did not issue share grants to our executives and non-officer key employees during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Share grants awarded for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 were valued at $36.73 per share based on their market value on the date of grant. There were no forfeitures of share grants in the second quarter 2006.

The total share grants vested at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were 170,628 and 124,175, respectively. The total share grants unvested at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were 132,665 and 103,989, respectively, and the weighted average grant-date fair value of those unvested shares was $32.73 and $30.76, respectively. The total compensation expense recognized in income for stock-based compensation awards for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period was $1.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively and $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $4.3 million, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 35 months.

Other Benefit Plans

We have a Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which permits all eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, the company may make discretionary contributions on behalf of eligible employees. The company made contributions to the 401(k) plan of $80,000 and $154,000,

18

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively and $74,000 and $141,000 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively.

We adopted a split dollar life insurance plan for executive officers (the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Real Estate and Senior Vice President Accounting and Administration) and other company officers, excluding the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), in 2000. The purpose of the plan was to provide these officers with financial security in exchange for a career commitment. It was intended that we would recover our costs from the life insurance policies at death prior to retirement, termination prior to retirement or retirement at age 65. Prior to April, 2006, the Trust had a security interest in the cash value and death benefit of each policy to the extent of the sum of premium payments made, while the officers had an interest in the excess cash value of each policy over the premiums WRIT paid. The company paid no premiums during the 2005 Quarter and premiums of $0.2 million for the 2005 Period under the split dollar plans. We terminated the split-dollar agreements in April 2006, thus regaining ownership of the policies. The company paid premiums of $0.5 million for both the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period under the new corporate owned life insurance policies.

We have adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the officers and members of the Board of Trustees. The plan allows for a deferral of a percentage of annual cash compensation and trustee fees. The plan is unfunded and payments are to be made out of the general assets of the Trust. The deferred compensation liability was $1.7 million and $1.6 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

We established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) effective July 1, 2002 for the benefit of the CEO. Under this plan, upon the participant’s termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than death or discharge for cause the participant will be entitled to receive an annual benefit equal to the participant’s accrued benefit times the participant’s vested interest. We account for these plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” whereby we accrue benefit cost in an amount that will result in an accrued balance at the end of each participant’s employment which is not less than the present value of the estimated benefit payments to be made. We recognized current service cost of $117,000 and $233,000 for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively, and $101,000 and $203,000 for the 2005 Quarter and 2005 Period, respectively.

In November 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the establishment of a SERP for the benefit of the executive officers and other company officers. This is a defined contribution plan under which, upon a participant’s termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than discharge for cause, the participant will be entitled to receive a benefit equal to the participant’s accrued benefit times the participant’s vested interest. We account for this plan in accordance with EITF 97-14, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested” and FAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” whereby the investments are reported at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are included in earnings. We recognized current service cost of $64,000 and $128,000 for the 2006 Quarter and 2006 Period, respectively.

19

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 8: EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per average share and diluted average shares (in thousands, except per share data):

NOTE 9: SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have five reportable segments: office buildings, medical office buildings, retail centers, multifamily properties and industrial/flex centers. Office buildings provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Medical office buildings provide offices and facilities for a variety of medical services. Retail centers are typically neighborhood grocery store or drug store anchored retail centers. Multifamily properties provide housing for families throughout the Washington Metropolitan area. Industrial/flex centers are used for flex-office, warehousing and distribution type facilities.

Segment reporting has been restated for prior periods to conform to the presentation of the medical office segment separate from the office segment.

Real estate revenue as a percentage of total revenue for each of the five reportable operating segments is as follows:

20

Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

The percentage of total real estate assets, at cost, for each of the five reportable operating segments is as follows:

The accounting policies of each of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. We evaluate performance based upon operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable segments are consolidations of similar properties. They are managed separately because each segment requires different operating, pricing and leasing strategies. All of these properties have been acquired separately and are incorporated into the applicable segment.

Segment Information (in thousands):