Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-6622

 

 

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE

INVESTMENT TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

MARYLAND   53-0261100
(State of incorporation)   (IRS Employer Identification Number)

6110 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD, SUITE 800, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20852

(Address of principal executive office) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (301) 984-9400

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of exchange on which registered

Shares of Beneficial Interest   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

As of November 2, 2011, 66,069,443 common shares were outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

INDEX

 

         Page  

Part I: Financial Information

  

Item 1.

 

Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

     4   
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

     5   
 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

     6   
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

     7   
 

Notes to Financial Statements

     8   

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     21   

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     46   

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

     46   

Part II: Other Information

  

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

     47   

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

     47   

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     47   

Item 3.

 

Defaults upon Senior Securities

     47   

Item 4.

 

(Removed and Reserved)

     47   

Item 5.

 

Other Information

     47   

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

     48   
 

Signatures

     52   

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Statements of Cash Flows reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the three years ended December 31, 2010 included in WRIT’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

3


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 

Assets

    

Land

   $ 472,812      $ 381,338   

Income producing property

     1,924,526        1,670,598   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     2,397,338        2,051,936   

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (516,319     (460,678
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income producing property

     1,881,019        1,591,258   

Development in progress

     39,735        26,240   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate held for investment, net

     1,920,754        1,617,498   

Investment in real estate sold or held for sale, net

     69,990        286,842   

Cash and cash equivalents

     40,751        78,767   

Restricted cash

     23,267        20,486   

Rents and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,122 and $7,422, respectively

     52,396        44,280   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     125,689        92,040   

Other assets related to properties sold or held for sale

     3,505        27,968   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 2,236,352      $ 2,167,881   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

    

Notes payable

   $ 657,378      $ 753,587   

Mortgage notes payable

     428,909        361,860   

Lines of credit

     193,000        100,000   

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     55,879        49,138   

Advance rents

     13,393        11,099   

Tenant security deposits

     8,751        7,390   

Other liabilities related to properties sold or held for sale

     19,229        23,949   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,376,539        1,307,023   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity

    

Shareholders’ equity

    

Shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 66,066 and 65,870 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     661        659   

Additional paid in capital

     1,136,240        1,127,825   

Distributions in excess of net income

     (281,930     (269,935

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (160     (1,469
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     854,811        857,080   

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

     5,002        3,778   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

     859,813        860,858   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 2,236,352      $ 2,167,881   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenue

        

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 71,931      $ 65,032      $ 212,819      $ 193,126   

Expenses

        

Real estate expenses

     24,070        21,912        71,124        65,627   

Depreciation and amortization

     23,479        20,224        67,899        59,574   

General and administrative

     3,837        3,141        11,588        10,455   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     51,386        45,277        150,611        135,656   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Real estate operating income

     20,545        19,755        62,208        57,470   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other income (expense)

        

Interest expense

     (16,508     (16,717     (50,266     (49,662

Acquisition costs

     (1,600     —          (3,571     (452

Other income

     270        289        886        875   

Gain from non-disposal activities

     —          4        —          4   

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

     —          (238     —          (280
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     (17,838     (16,662     (52,951     (49,515
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

     2,707        3,093        9,257        7,955   

Discontinued operations:

        

Gain on sale of real estate

     56,639        —          56,639        7,942   

Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale

     3,655        3,565        9,522        11,047   

Income tax benefit (expense)

     35        —          (1,138     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     60,329        3,565        65,023        18,989   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

     63,036        6,658        74,280        26,944   

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

     (28     (33     (85     (109
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 63,008      $ 6,625      $ 74,195      $ 26,835   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) attributable to the controlling interests per share:

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05      $ 0.14      $ 0.13   

Discontinued operations

     0.91        0.06        0.98        0.30   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests per share

   $ 0.95      $ 0.11      $ 1.12      $ 0.43   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted net income (loss) attributable to the controlling interests per share:

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05      $ 0.14      $ 0.13   

Discontinued operations

     0.91        0.05        0.98        0.30   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests per share

   $ 0.95      $ 0.10      $ 1.12      $ 0.43   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic

     66,017        62,894        65,953        61,332   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted

     66,064        63,055        65,987        61,460   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends declared and paid per share

   $ 0.4338      $ 0.4325      $ 1.3014      $ 1.2975   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

    Shares     Shares of
Beneficial
Interest at
Par Value
    Additional
Paid in
Capital
    Distributions in
Excess of Net Income
Attributable to  the
Controlling Interests
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total
Shareholders’
Equity
    Noncontrolling
Interests in
Subsidiaries
    Total
Equity
 

Balance, December 31, 2010

    65,870      $ 659      $ 1,127,825      $ (269,935   $ (1,469   $ 857,080      $ 3,778      $ 860,858   

Comprehensive income:

               

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

    —          —          —          74,195        —          74,195        —          74,195   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    —          —          —          —          —          —          85        85   

Change in fair value of interest rate hedge

    —          —          —          —          1,309        1,309        —          1,309   
           

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    —          —          —          —          —          75,504        85        75,589   

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

    —          —          —          —          —          —          (151     (151

Contributions from noncontrolling interest

    —          —          —          —          —          —          1,290        1,290   

Dividends

    —          —          —          (86,190     —          (86,190     —          (86,190

Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program

    125        1        3,849                      3,850               3,850   

Share options exercised

    43        1        1,087        —          —          1,088        —          1,088   

Share grants, net of share grant amortization and forfeitures

    28        —          3,479        —          —          3,479        —          3,479   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2011

    66,066      $ 661      $ 1,136,240      $ (281,930   $ (160   $ 854,811      $ 5,002      $ 859,813   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010  

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Net income

   $ 74,280      $ 26,944   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations

     75,130        71,555   

Provision for losses on accounts receivable

     3,009        3,319   

Real estate impairment

     599        —     

Amortization of share grants, net

     3,850        3,969   

Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and related financing costs

     2,644        4,576   

Gain on sale of real estate

     (56,639     (7,942

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

     —          280   

Changes in operating other assets

     (18,782     (18,872

Changes in operating other liabilities

     2,296        (348
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     86,387        83,481   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Real estate acquisitions, net

     (281,701     (68,000

Net cash received for sale of real estate

     289,221        22,204   

Capital improvements to real estate

     (18,117     (14,569

Development in progress

     (12,128     (1,174

Non-real estate capital improvements

     (442     (256
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (23,167     (61,795
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Line of credit borrowings

     221,000        62,800   

Line of credit repayments

     (128,000     (90,800

Dividends paid

     (86,190     (80,387

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

     (151     (137

Proceeds from dividend reinvestment program

     3,850        3,924   

Principal payments – mortgage notes payable

     (12,403     (24,870

Financing costs

     (3,909     (2,101

Net proceeds from debt offerings

     —          247,998   

Net proceeds from equity offerings

     —          118,068   

Notes payable repayments, including penalties for early extinguishment

     (96,521     (8,843

Net proceeds from exercise of share options

     1,088        3,872   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by and (used in) financing activities

     (101,236     229,524   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (38,016     251,210   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     78,767        11,203   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 40,751      $ 262,413   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

   $ 45,525      $ 46,078   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“We” or “WRIT”), a Maryland real estate investment trust, is a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business consists of the ownership and development of income-producing real estate properties in the greater Washington metro region. We own a diversified portfolio of office buildings, medical office buildings, industrial/flex centers, multifamily buildings and retail centers.

Federal Income Taxes

We believe that we qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our shareholders. When selling properties, we have the option of (a) reinvesting the sales proceeds of properties sold, allowing for a deferral of income taxes on the sale, (b) paying out capital gains to the shareholders with no tax to WRIT or (c) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the shareholders.

Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed REIT taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS’s”). Our TRS’s are subject to corporate federal and state income tax on their taxable income at regular statutory rates.

On August 5, 2011, we entered into five separate purchase and sale agreements to effectuate the sale of our entire industrial segment and two office assets for an aggregate purchase price of $350.0 million. On September 2, 2011, we closed the first three of the purchase and sale agreements, for an aggregate $235.8 million. We closed on the remaining two purchase and sale agreements subsequent to the end of the quarter. We recognized a $56.6 million gain on sale of real estate during the third quarter of 2011 in connection with the first three purchase and sale agreements. A portion of the capital gains from the sales were reinvested in replacement properties, with the remainder to be paid out to the shareholders.

NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Significant Accounting Policies

We have prepared our consolidated financial statements using the accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of WRIT, its majority-owned subsidiaries and entities in which WRIT has a controlling interest, including where WRIT has been determined to be a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Within these notes to the financial statements, we refer to the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 as the “2011 Quarter” and the “2010 Quarter”, respectively, and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 as the “2011 Period” and “2010 Period”, respectively.

Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

8


Table of Contents

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation due to the reclassification of certain properties as discontinued operations (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).

NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Acquisitions

WRIT acquired the following properties and land for development during the 2011 Period:

 

Acquisition Date

  

Property Name

  

Property Type

   Rentable
Square
Feet
     Contract
Purchase  Price
(in thousands)
 

January 11, 2011

   1140 Connecticut Avenue    Office      184,000       $ 80,250   

March 30, 2011

   1227 25th Street    Office      130,000         47,000   

June 15, 2011

   650 North Glebe Road(1)    Multifamily      N/A         11,800   

August 30, 2011

   Olney Village Center    Retail      199,000         58,000   

September 13, 2011

   Braddock Metro Center    Office      345,000         101,000   

September 15, 2011

   John Marshall II    Office      223,000         73,500   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 
      Total      1,081,000       $ 371,550   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) 

650 North Glebe Road is 37,000 square feet of land acquired by a consolidated joint venture for the purpose of developing an apartment community. WRIT is a 90% owner of the joint venture.

The results of operations from the acquired operating properties are included in the consolidated statements of income as of their acquisition dates.

The revenue and earnings of our 2011 acquisitions are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
2011
     Period Ended
September 30,
2011
 

Real estate revenues

   $ 4,376       $ 9,458   

Net income

   $ 292       $ 730   

We have recorded the total purchase price of the above acquisitions as follows (in millions):

 

     Recordation
of Purchase
Price
 
     2011  

Land

   $ 90.9   

Buildings

     219.6   

Tenant origination costs

     15.7   

Leasing commissions/absorption costs

     29.7   

Net lease intangible assets

     6.8   

Net lease intangible liabilities

     (2.5

Fair value of assumed mortgages

     (78.5
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 281.7   
  

 

 

 

The weighted remaining average life in months for the components above, other than land and building, are 65 months for tenant origination costs, 54 months for leasing commissions/absorption costs, 68 months for net lease intangible assets and 65 months for net lease intangible liabilities.

The difference in total contract purchase price of $371.6 million and the acquisition cost per the consolidated statements of cash flows of $281.7 million is primarily related to the two mortgage notes assumed for $76.7 million relating to John Marshall II and Olney Village Center, cash paid for the acquisition of land at 650 North Glebe Road for $11.8 million included in development, and credits received at settlement totaling $1.3 million.

The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations present the consolidated results of operations for the 2011 Quarter and Period and the 2010 Quarter and Period, as if the above described acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the year prior to the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for the Quarters and Periods presented. The unaudited data presented is in thousands, except per share data.

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
     Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Real estate revenues

   $ 76,823       $ 74,471       $ 231,370       $ 221,135   

Income from continuing operations

   $ 3,283       $ 4,046       $ 11,330       $ 10,784   

Net income

   $ 63,585       $ 7,578       $ 76,268       $ 29,665   

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.96       $ 0.12       $ 1.15       $ 0.48   

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

We entered into an operating partnership agreement with a member of the entity that previously owned Northern Virginia Industrial Park II in conjunction with the acquisition of this property in May 1998. We account for this activity by applying the noncontrolling owner’s percentage ownership interest to the net income of the property and reporting such amount in our net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter, we closed on the sale of Northern Virginia Industrial Park II (see next section), thereby terminating this noncontrolling interest in our earnings. Accordingly, the total amounts reported on the consolidated statements of income for noncontrolling interests are related to discontinued operations.

 

9


Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations

We dispose of assets (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) that no longer meet our long-term strategy or return objectives and where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be reinvested into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders. Properties are considered held for sale when they meet the criteria specified by GAAP. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued at that time, but operating revenues, other operating expenses and interest continue to be recognized until the date of sale.

On August 5, 2011 we entered into five separate purchase and sale agreements to effectuate the sale of our entire industrial segment and two office assets (the Crescent and Albemarle Point) for an aggregate purchase price of $350.0 million. On September 2, 2011, we closed the first three of the purchase and sale agreements, for an aggregate $235.8 million. We closed on the remaining two purchase and sale agreements subsequent to the end of the quarter. We recognized a $56.6 million gain on sale of real estate during the 2011 Quarter in connection with the first three purchase and sale agreements.

The impact of the disposal of our industrial segment on revenues and net income is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
     Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Real estate revenues

   $ 6,053       $ 7,854       $ 22,503       $ 24,252   

Net income

   $ 3,297       $ 2,778       $ 9,340       $ 8,215   

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.05       $ 0.04       $ 0.14       $ 0.13   

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.05       $ 0.04       $ 0.14       $ 0.13   

We sold or classified as held for sale the following properties during the 2011 Period and 2010:

 

Disposition Date

  

Property Name

  

Property Type

   Rentable
Square
Feet
     Contract
Purchase Price
(In millions)
 

September 2, 2011

   Industrial Portfolio(1)    Industrial/Office      3,092,000       $ 350.0   

April 5, 2011

   Dulles Station, Phase I    Office      180,000         58.8   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 
     

Total 2011

     3,272,000       $ 408.8   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

June 18, 2010

   Parklawn Portfolio(2)    Office/Industrial      229,000       $ 23.4   

December 21, 2010

   The Ridges    Office      104,000         27.5   

December 22, 2010

   Ammendale I&II and Amvax    Industrial      305,000         23.0   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 
     

Total 2010

     638,000       $ 73.9   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) 

The Industrial Portfolio consists of every property in our industrial segment and two office properties (the Crescent and Albemarle Point). On September 2, 2011 we closed on the sale of industrial properties (8880 Gorman Road, Dulles South IV, Fullerton Business Center, Hampton Overlook, Alban Business Center, Pickett Industrial Park, Northern Virginia Industrial Park I, 270 Technology Park, Fullerton Industrial Center, Sully Square, 9950 Business Parkway, Hampton South and 8900 Telegraph Road) and two office properties (Crescent and Albemarle Point). We closed on the sales of the remaining properties in the Industrial Portfolio subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter.

(2)

The Parklawn Portfolio consists of three office properties (Parklawn Plaza, Lexington Building and Saratoga Building) and one industrial property (Charleston Business Center).

 

10


Table of Contents

Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
    Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenues

   $ 6,597      $ 11,241      $ 25,612      $ 36,410   

Property expenses

     (1,768     (3,239     (7,564     (11,866

Real estate impairment

     —          —          (599     —     

Depreciation and amortization

     (943     (4,054     (7,231     (11,981

Interest expense

     (231     (383     (696     (1,516
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 3,655      $ 3,565      $ 9,522      $ 11,047   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) by each property classified as discontinued operations is summarized below (in thousands):

 

          Quarter Ended
September 30,
     Period Ended
September 30,
 

Property

  

Segment

   2011      2010      2011     2010  

Parklawn Plaza

   Office    $ —         $ —         $ —        $ 132   

Lexington Building

   Office      —           —           —          65   

Saratoga Building

   Office      —           —           —          225   

Charleston Business Center

   Industrial      —           —           —          370   

The Ridges

   Office      —           156         —          347   

Ammendale I&II

   Industrial      —           217         —          733   

Amvax

   Industrial      —           82         —          260   

Dulles Station, Phase I

   Office      —           160         (468     367   

Industrial Portfolio

   Industrial/Office    $ 3,655         2,950       $ 9,990        8,548   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
      $ 3,655         3,565       $ 9,522      $ 11,047   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The operating loss for Dulles Station I for the 2011 Period includes a $0.6 million impairment charge to reflect the property’s fair value less any selling costs based on its contract sales price.

NOTE 4: MORTAGE NOTES PAYABLE

On August 30, 2011, we assumed a $22.6 million mortgage note as partial consideration for the acquisition of Olney Village Center. This mortgage note bears interest at 6.37% per annum. The fair value interest rate on this mortgage note is 4.94%, based on quotes obtained for similar loans. We recorded the mortgage at its fair value of $24.4 million. Principal and interest are payable monthly until November 1, 2023, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full.

On September 15, 2011, we assumed a $54.1 million mortgage note as partial consideration for the acquisition of John Marshall II. This mortgage note bears interest at 5.79% per annum, which approximates its fair value interest rate, based on quotes obtained for similar loans. Principal and interest are payable monthly until May 6, 2016, at which time all unpaid principal and interest are payable in full.

On September 1, 2011, we repaid without penalty the remaining $9.1 million of principal on the mortgage note secured by Shady Grove Medical Village II.

Subsequent to the end of 2011 Quarter, on October 5, 2011, we entered into an amendment to the purchase and sale agreement for 6100 Columbia Park Road and Dulles Business Park , under which we agreed to seek prepayment of the mortgage notes secured by Dulles Business Park prior to closing the sale. Under the terms of the amendment, if we prepaid the mortgage notes prior to November 1, 2011, then the sales price would be increased by $875,000 in order to partially offset the penalties incurred by us for the prepayment of the mortgage notes. On October 7, 2011, we prepaid the remaining $17.9 million of principal on the mortgage notes, incurring prepayment penalties of approximately $1.0 million. Because Dulles Business Park is considered held for sale as of September 30, 2011 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements), these mortgage notes are included in “Other liabilities related to properties sold or held for sale” on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 5: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE

As of September 30, 2011, we maintained a $75.0 million unsecured line of credit (“Credit Facility No. 1”) maturing in June 2012 and a $400.0 million unsecured line of credit (“Credit Facility No. 2”) maturing in July 2014.

The amounts of these lines of credit unused and available at September 30, 2011 are as follows (in millions):

 

     Credit Facility
No. 1
    Credit Facility
No. 2
 

Committed capacity

   $ 75.0      $ 400.0   

Borrowings outstanding

     (74.0     (119.0

Letters of credit issued

     (0.8     (0.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unused and available

   $ 0.2      $ 280.1   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

We executed borrowings and repayments on the unsecured lines of credit during the 2011 Quarter as follows (in millions):

 

     Credit Facility
No. 1
     Credit Facility
No. 2
 

Balance at June 30, 2011

   $ 74.0       $ 171.0   

Borrowings

     —           58.0   

Repayments

     —           (110.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2011

   $ 74.0       $ 119.0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

We made borrowings during the 2011 Quarter to partially fund the acquisitions of Olney Village Center and John Marshall II, to pay off the Shady Grove Medical Center mortgage note and for general corporate purposes. We made a repayment during the 2011 Quarter using proceeds from the first phase of the sale of the Industrial Portfolio.

NOTE 6: NOTES PAYABLE

We repaid the remaining $2.7 million of our 3.875% convertible notes without penalty in September 2011 using proceeds from the sale of the Industrial Portfolio.

NOTE 7: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In May 2009, we entered into a forward interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100.0 million that qualifies as a cash flow hedge. We enter into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to variable rate interest risk. We do not purchase derivatives for speculation. We record our cash flow hedges at fair value in accordance with GAAP, based on various discounted cash flow methodologies and observable inputs. We record the effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income. This change in fair value of cash flow hedges is the only activity in other comprehensive income (loss) during the periods presented in our consolidated financial statements. We record the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges in earnings in the period affected. We assess the effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. We deemed the hedges to be effective for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods, as applicable.

The fair value and balance sheet locations of the interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in millions):

 

     September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     Fair Value      Fair Value  

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   $ 0.2       $ 1.5   

The interest rate swap has been effective since inception. The gain or loss on the effective swaps is recognized in other comprehensive income, as follows (in millions):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
     Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     Fair Value      Fair Value      Fair Value      Fair Value  

Change in other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 0.5       $ —         $ 1.3       $ (0.1

 

12


Table of Contents

Derivative instruments expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparty under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreement. We believe that we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our on-going control procedures, we monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, thus minimizing our credit risk concentration.

NOTE 8: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

WRIT maintains short-term and long-term incentive plans that allow for stock-based awards to officers and non-officer employees. Stock based awards are provided to officers and non-officer employees, as well as trustees, under the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan which allows for awards in the form of restricted shares, restricted share units, options, and other awards up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares over the ten year period in which the plan will be in effect. Restricted share units are converted into shares of our stock upon full vesting through the issuance of new shares.

WRIT’s Compensation Committee conducted an extensive review of our executive compensation philosophy and a fundamental redesign of our short-term and long-term incentive plans for our officers, resulting in new short-term incentive (“New STIP”) and new long-term incentive (“New LTIP”) plans, which were approved by the Compensation Committee and Board on February 17, 2011 and were effective as of January 1, 2011.

New STIP

Under the New STIP, officers will earn awards, payable 50% in cash and 50% in restricted shares, based on a percentage of salary and achieving various performance conditions within a one-year performance period (except for 15% of such restricted share awards which will be exclusively service-based).

With respect to the 50% of the New STIP award payable in restricted shares, (i) the restricted shares subject to performance conditions will vest over a three-year period commencing on the January 1 following the end of the one-year performance period, and (ii) the restricted shares subject only to a service condition will vest over a three year period commencing at the beginning of the one-year performance period.

With respect to the 50% of the award payable in cash, the officer may elect to defer up to 80% of the cash portion pursuant to WRIT’s deferred compensation plan for officers. If the officer makes such election, the cash will be converted to restricted share units and WRIT will match 25% of deferred amounts in restricted share units.

For the service based awards we recognize compensation expense based on the grant date fair value, ratably over a three-year period commencing with the start of the performance period. With respect to the restricted shares subject to performance conditions expected to be awarded under the New STIP at the end of the one-year performance period, we recognize compensation expense based on the current fair market value of the probable award until the performance condition has been met, according to a graded vesting schedule over a four-year period commencing with the date the performance targets were established. Approximately 20% of the restricted shares subject to performance conditions awarded by the Compensation Committee at the end of the one-year performance period are based on subjective strategic acquisition and disposition goal criteria, for which we recognize compensation expense when the grant date occurs at the end of the one-year period.

New LTIP

Under the New LTIP, officers will earn awards, payable 50% in unrestricted shares and 50% in restricted shares, based on a percentage of salary and achieving various market and performance conditions during a defined three-year performance period (e.g., commencing on January 1, 2011 and concluding on December 31, 2013).

New LTIP performance will be evaluated on objective and subjective performance goals and weightings. Of the officers’ total potential award, 40% is subject to market conditions based on absolute total shareholder return (“TSR”) and relative TSR. The remaining 60% of the award is based primarily on strategic plan fulfillment, evaluated and determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion at the end of the three-year performance period.

 

13


Table of Contents

The unrestricted shares vest immediately at the end of the three-year performance period, and the restricted shares vest over a one-year period commencing on the January 1 following the end of the three-year performance period.

With respect to the 40% of the New LTIP subject to market conditions we recognize compensation expense ratably (over three years for the 50% unrestricted shares and over four years for the 50% restricted shares) based on the grant date fair value, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, and regardless of whether the market conditions are achieved and the awards ultimately vest. With respect to the 60% subjective portion of the New LTIP, we will recognize compensation expense for the 50% unrestricted shares when the grant date has occurred at the end of the three year performance period. We will recognize compensation expense for the 50% restricted shares over the one-year vesting period commencing upon the grant date at the end of the three-year performance period.

Modification of Prior LTIP Awards

In connection with the adoption of the New STIP and the New LTIP, the prior LTIP for officers was amended such that awards subject to performance conditions through 2012 under the prior LTIP were converted when the new plans were adopted into 154,400 restricted share units as of February 17, 2011. Such restricted share units will vest consistent with the periods in which they otherwise would have vested under the terms of the prior LTIP (i.e., either December 31, 2011 or December 31, 2012). We accounted for the amendment of these awards as a modification.

Prior LTIP

Other non-officer members of management continue to earn restricted share units under the prior LTIP based upon various percentages of their salaries that vest ratably over five years from the grant date based upon continued employment. We recognize compensation expense for these awards according to a graded vesting schedule over six years from the date the performance target was established.

Trustee Awards

We continue to award trustees share based compensation on an annual basis in the form of restricted shares which vest immediately and are restricted from sale for the period of the trustees’ service.

Total Compensation Expense

Total compensation expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements for all share based awards, including share grants, restricted share units and performance share units, in the 2011 and 2010 Quarters was (in thousands):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
     Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Stock Based Compensation Expense

   $ 1.4       $ 1.3       $ 4.1       $ 4.3   

Restricted and Unrestricted Shares

The total fair value of prior period shares vested during the 2011 Period is $28,800; no shares vested during the 2011 Quarter. As of September 30, 2011, there are no remaining unvested restricted shares granted under prior LTIPs.

During the 2011 Period, 10,822 restricted shares, with a total fair value of $0.3 million, were granted under the New STIP to officers for the portion of the New STIP award subject only to service conditions. We value these awards based on the fair market value on the date of grant. As of September 30, 2011, the total unamortized value of these unvested share awards was $265,600, which we expect to recognize as compensation expense over a weighted average period of 27 months. As of September 30, 2011, the future expected expense related to restricted shares with performance conditions, estimated based on the probable number of restricted shares expected to be awarded under the New STIP, totaled $0.6 million, which we expect to recognize as compensation cost over a weighted average period of 28 months.

Restricted and Unrestricted Shares with Market Conditions

Stock based awards with market conditions under the New LTIP were granted in February 2011 with fair market values, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, as follows (in thousands):

 

     Grant Date Fair Value  
     Restricted      Unrestricted  

Relative TSR

   $ 1,066       $ 1,066   

Absolute TSR

   $ 365       $ 365   

 

14


Table of Contents

The unamortized value of these awards with market conditions as of September 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):

 

     Unamortized Value at
September 30, 2011
 
     Restricted      Unrestricted  

Relative TSR

   $ 894       $ 834   

Absolute TSR

   $ 306       $ 286   

We expect to recognize these unamortized values as compensation expense over a weighted average life of 39 months for the restricted shares and 27 months for the unrestricted shares.

Restricted Share Units

Restricted share units granted to officers and non-officers in prior periods continue to vest in the current year. The total fair value of restricted share units vested during the 2011 Quarter is zero and during the Period is $247,100. In connection with the adoption of new executive incentive plans, on February 17, 2011, all performance share units were converted into a fixed number of restricted share units. The total number of restricted share units awarded was 89,000 and 65,400, which vest on December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The value of unvested restricted share units at September 30, 2011 was $4.1 million, which we expect to recognize as compensation cost over a weighted average period of 27 months. As of September 30, 2011, the future expected expense related to restricted share units with performance conditions expected to be awarded to non-officers in December 2011 is $0.8 million, which we expect to recognize as compensation cost over a weighted average period of 28 months.

Options

WRIT still has options outstanding from the 2001 Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Plan for Trustees. The 103,102 options outstanding at September 30, 2011, all of which are exercisable, have exercise prices between $24.85 and $33.09, with a weighted-average exercise price of $27.31 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.6 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding exercisable shares at September 30, 2011 was $0.1 million. There were 42,883 options exercised in the 2011 Period, with an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.2 million.

NOTE 9: FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosures about the fair value measurements are required to be disclosed separately for each major category of assets and liabilities, as follows:

Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets

Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs

Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs

The only assets or liabilities we had at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are the assets held in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (“SERP”) and the interest rate hedge contracts. We base the valuations related to these items on assumptions derived from significant other observable inputs and accordingly these valuations fall into Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of these assets and liabilities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in millions):

 

     September 30, 2011      December 31, 2010  
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Assets:

                       

SERP

   $ 1.8       $ —         $ 1.8       $ —         $ 1.7       $ —         $ 1.7       $ —     

Liabilities:

                       

Derivatives

   $ 0.2       $ —         $ 0.2       $ —         $ 1.5       $ —         $ 1.5       $ —     

 

15


Table of Contents

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

The following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management using available market information and established valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow. Many of these estimates involve significant judgment. The estimated fair value disclosed may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have an effect on the estimated fair value amounts. In addition, fair value estimates are made at a point in time and thus, estimates of fair value subsequent to September 30, 2011 may differ significantly from the amounts presented.

Below is a summary of significant methodologies used in estimating fair values and a schedule of fair values at September 30, 2011.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and commercial paper with original maturities of less than 90 days, which are valued at the carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Notes Receivable

The fair value of the notes is estimated based on quotes for debt with similar terms and characteristics or a discounted cash flow methodology using market discount rates if reliable quotes are not available.

Mortgage Notes Payable

Mortgage notes payable consist of instruments in which certain of our real estate assets are used for collateral. The fair value of the mortgage notes payable is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads estimated through independent comparisons to real estate assets or loans with similar characteristics.

Lines of Credit Payable

Lines of credit payable consist of bank facilities which we use for various purposes including working capital, acquisition funding or capital improvements. The lines of credit advances are priced at a specified rate plus a spread. The carrying value of the lines of credit payable is estimated to be market value given the adjustable rate of these borrowings.

Notes Payable

The fair value of the notes payable is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads derived using the relevant securities’ market prices.

 

     September 30, 2011      December 31, 2010  
(in thousands)    Carrying
Value
     Fair Value      Carrying
Value
     Fair Value  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 40,751       $ 40,751       $ 78,767       $ 78,767   

Restricted cash

   $ 23,267       $ 23,267       $ 20,486       $ 20,486   

2445 M Street note receivable

   $ 6,844       $ 7,807       $ 7,090       $ 8,048   

Mortgage notes payable

   $ 428,909       $ 463,801       $ 361,860       $ 380,360   

Lines of credit payable

   $ 193,000       $ 193,000       $ 100,000       $ 100,000   

Notes payable

   $ 657,378       $ 726,957       $ 753,587       $ 785,637   

NOTE 10: EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

We determine “Basic earnings per share” using the two-class method as our unvested restricted share awards have non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and are therefore considered participating securities. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to the controlling interest less the allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

We also determine “Diluted earnings per share” under the two-class method with respect to the unvested restricted share awards. We further evaluate any other potentially dilutive securities at the end of the period and adjust the basic earnings per share calculation for the impact of those securities that are dilutive. Our diluted earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive impact of employee stock options based on the treasury stock method and our long-term incentive share units under the contingently issuable method. The diluted earnings per share calculation also considers our operating partnership units and 3.875% convertible notes under the if-converted method. The operating partnership units were anti-dilutive for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods and are not included in our earnings per share calculations. The 3.875% convertible notes, which were repaid in full during the 2011 Quarter, were anti-dilutive for the reporting periods during which they were outstanding.

 

16


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts in thousands; except per share data):

 

     Quarter Ended
September 30,
    Period Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Numerator:

        

Income from continuing operations

   $ 2,707      $ 3,093      $ 9,257      $ 7,955   

Allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units

     (17     (21     (57     (97
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted income from continuing operations attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 2,690      $ 3,072      $ 9,200      $ 7,858   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, including gain on sale of real estate, net of taxes

     60,329        3,565        65,023        18,989   

Allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units

     (368   $ —          (395   $ —     

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (28     (33     (85     (109
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted income from discontinuing operations attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 59,933      $ 3,532      $ 64,543      $ 18,880   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 62,623      $ 6,604      $ 73,743      $ 26,738   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

        

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic

     66,017        62,894        65,953        61,332   

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Employee stock options and restricted share awards

     47        161        34        128   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted

     66,064        63,055        65,987        61,460   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per common share, basic:

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05      $ 0.14      $ 0.13   

Discontinued operations

   $ 0.91      $ 0.06      $ 0.98      $ 0.30   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0.95      $ 0.11      $ 1.12      $ 0.43   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per common share, diluted:

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05      $ 0.14      $ 0.13   

Discontinued operations

   $ 0.91      $ 0.05      $ 0.98      $ 0.30   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0.95      $ 0.10      $ 1.12      $ 0.43   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 11: SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have five reportable segments: office, medical office, retail, multifamily and industrial/flex properties. Office buildings provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Medical office buildings provide offices and facilities for a variety of medical services. Retail centers are typically neighborhood grocery store or drug store anchored retail centers. Multifamily properties provide rental housing for individuals and families throughout the Washington metropolitan area. Industrial/flex centers are used for flex-office, warehousing, services and distribution type facilities. The industrial/flex centers segment is classified as properties sold or held for sale and is presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income (see note 3 to the consolidate financial statements).

We evaluate performance based upon operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable operating segments are consolidations of similar properties. GAAP requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segments’ performance. Net operating income is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss. Net operating income is defined as segment real estate rental revenue less segment real estate expenses.

 

17


Table of Contents

The following tables present revenues and net operating income for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods from these segments, and reconciles net operating income of reportable segments to net income as reported (in thousands):

 

$1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692
     Quarter Ended September 30, 2011  
     Office      Medical
Office
     Retail      Multifamily      Industrial/
Flex
    Corporate
and Other
     Consolidated  

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 35,209       $ 11,351       $ 12,500       $ 12,871       $ —        $ —         $ 71,931   

Real estate expenses

     12,190         3,656         3,067         5,157         —          —           24,070   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net operating income

   $ 23,019       $ 7,695       $ 9,433       $ 7,714       $ —        $ —         $ 47,861   

Depreciation and amortization

                      (23,479

Interest expense

                      (16,508

General and administrative

                      (3,837

Acquisition costs

                      (1,600

Other income

                      270   

Discontinued operations:

                   

Gain (loss) from discontinued operations

                      3,655   

Gain on sale of real estate

                      56,639   

Income tax benefit

                      35   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

                      63,036   

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                      (28
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

                    $ 63,008   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

   $ 4,808       $ 926       $ 817       $ 1,260       $ (93   $ 211       $ 7,929   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,134,692       $ 349,469       $ 369,162       $ 235,448       $ 73,494      $ 74,087       $ 2,236,352   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

$1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692 $1,134,692
     Quarter Ended September 30, 2010  
     Office      Medical
Office
     Retail      Multifamily      Industrial/
Flex
     Corporate
and Other
     Consolidated  

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 31,740       $ 10,993       $ 9,865       $ 12,434       $ —         $ —         $ 65,032   

Real estate expenses

     11,451         3,635         2,028         4,798         —           —           21,912   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net operating income

   $ 20,289       $ 7,358       $ 7,837       $ 7,636       $ —         $ —         $ 43,120   

Depreciation and amortization

                       (20,224

Interest expense

                       (16,717

General and administrative

                       (3,141

Acquisition costs

                       —     

Other income

                       289   

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                       (238

Gain from non-disposal activities

                       4   

Discontinued operations:

                    

Income from discontinued operations

                       3,565   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

                       6,658   

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                       (33
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

                     $ 6,625   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

   $ 2,925       $ 676       $ 896       $ 548       $ 452       $ 92       $ 5,589   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 964,235       $ 356,115       $ 224,707       $ 231,855       $ 240,822       $ 293,245       $ 2,310,979   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

18


Table of Contents
$10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641
     Period Ended September 30, 2011  
     Office      Medical
Office
     Retail      Multifamily      Industrial/
Flex
     Corporate
and Other
     Consolidated  

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 103,860       $ 34,002       $ 36,884       $ 38,073       $ —         $ —         $ 212,819   

Real estate expenses

     35,305         10,747         10,228         14,844         —           —           71,124   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net operating income

   $ 68,555       $ 23,255       $ 26,656       $ 23,229       $ —         $ —         $ 141,695   

Depreciation and amortization

                       (67,899

Interest expense

                       (50,266

General and administrative

                       (11,588

Acquisition costs

                       (3,571

Other income

                       886   

Discontinued operations:

                    

Gain on sale of real estate

                       56,639   

Income tax expense

                       (1,138

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

                       9,522   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

                       74,280   

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                       (85
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

                     $ 74,195   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

   $ 10,641       $ 2,883       $ 2,288       $ 1,901       $ 404       $ 442       $ 18,559   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

$10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641 $10,641
     Period Ended September 30, 2010  
     Office      Medical
Office
     Retail      Multifamily      Industrial/
Flex
     Corporate
and Other
     Consolidated  

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 92,673       $ 33,695       $ 30,566       $ 36,192       $ —         $ —         $ 193,126   

Real estate expenses

     32,135         11,190         7,877         14,425         —           —           65,627   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net operating income

   $ 60,538       $ 22,505       $ 22,689       $ 21,767       $ —         $ —         $ 127,499   

Depreciation and amortization

                       (59,574

Interest expense

                       (49,662

General and administrative

                       (10,455

Acquisition costs

                       (452

Other income

                       875   

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, net

                       (280

Gain from non-disposal activities

                       4   

Discontinued operations:

                    

Gain on sale of real estate

                       7,942   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

                       11,047   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

                       26,944   

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                       (109
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

                     $ 26,835   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

   $ 8,049       $ 3,398       $ 1,101       $ 1,279       $ 742       $ 256       $ 14,825   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents

12: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter, we closed on the final two transactions of the Industrial Portfolio sale. On October 3, 2011, we sold Northern Virginia Industrial Park II for $44.5 million. On November 1, 2011, we sold 6100 Columbia Park Road and Dulles Business Park for $70.6 million at a gain.

 

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report and the more detailed information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011.

We refer to the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 as the “2011 Quarter” and the “2010 Quarter”, respectively, and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 as the “2011 Period” and the “2010 Period”, respectively.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements in this report preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “project,” “will” and other similar expressions. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for these statements. The following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: (a) the effects of changes in Federal government spending; (b) the economic health of the greater Washington metro region, or other markets we may enter; (c) the timing and pricing of lease transactions; (d) the effect of the recent credit and financial market conditions; (e) the availability and cost of capital; (f) fluctuations in interest rates; (g) the economic health of our tenants; (h) the supply of competing properties; (i) consumer confidence; (j) unemployment rates; (k) consumer tastes and preferences; (l) our future capital requirements; (m) inflation; (n) compliance with applicable laws, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities; (o) governmental or regulatory actions and initiatives; (p) changes in general economic and business conditions; (q) terrorist attacks or actions; (r) acts of war; (s) weather conditions; (t) the effects of changes in capital available to the technology and biotechnology sectors of the economy, and (u) other factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011. We undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect new information, future events, or otherwise.

General

Introductory Matters

We provide our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations and financial condition. We organize the MD&A as follows:

 

   

Overview. Discussion of our business, operating results, investment activity and capital requirements, and summary of our significant transactions to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.

 

   

Results of Operations. Discussion of our financial results comparing the 2011 Quarter to the 2010 Quarter and the 2011 Period to the 2010 Period.

 

   

Liquidity and Capital Resources. Discussion of our financial condition and analysis of changes in our capital structure and cash flows.

 

   

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Descriptions of accounting policies that reflect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

When evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, we focus on the following financial and non-financial indicators:

 

   

Net operating income (“NOI”), calculated as real estate rental revenue less real estate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization, interest expense and general and administrative expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.

 

   

Funds From Operations (“FFO”), calculated as set forth below under the caption “Funds from Operations.” FFO is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.

 

   

Occupancy, calculated as occupied square footage as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period.

 

21


Table of Contents
   

Leased percentage, calculated as the percentage of physical net rentable area leased for our commercial segments and percentage of apartments leased for our multifamily segment.

 

   

Rental rates.

 

   

Leasing activity, including new leases, renewals and expirations.

For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our properties as “same-store”, “non-same-store” or discontinued operations. A “same-store” property is one that was owned for the entirety of the periods being evaluated, is stabilized from an occupancy standpoint and is included in continuing operations. A “non-same-store” property is one that was acquired or placed into service during either of the periods being evaluated and is included in continuing operations. Results for properties sold or held for sale during any of the periods evaluated are classified as discontinued operations.

Overview

Business

Our revenues are derived primarily from the ownership and operation of income-producing properties in the greater Washington metro region. As of September 30, 2011, we owned a diversified portfolio of 74 properties, totaling approximately 9.6 million square feet of commercial space and 2,540 multifamily units, and land held for development. These 74 properties consisted of 26 office properties, 3 industrial/flex properties, 18 medical office properties, 16 retail centers and 11 multifamily properties.

Operating Results

Our results of operations were as follows (in thousands):

 

     2011
Quarter
     2010
Quarter
     $ Change     % Change  

Real estate rental revenue

   $ 71,931       $ 65,032       $ 6,899        10.6

NOI (1)

   $ 47,861       $ 43,120       $ 4,741        11.0

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 63,008       $ 6,625       $ 56,383        851.1

FFO (2)

   $ 30,756       $ 30,899       $ (143     (0.5 )% 

 

(1) 

See page 30 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NOI to net income.

(2) 

See page 46 of the MD&A for reconciliations of FFO to net income.

The increases in real estate rental revenue and NOI are due to acquisitions made during the past year. NOI for the same-store portfolio has been flat, with higher rental rates and lower operating expenses offset by lower occupancy. The lower occupancy reflects continued difficulties in leasing vacant commercial space. We believe that the federal debt-ceiling debate during the 2011 Quarter and general concerns about the national economy are factors in the difficult leasing environment.

The increase in net income attributable to the controlling interests is due to the gain on the first phase of the sale of our industrial segment (see following section) during the 2011 Quarter.

Investment and Sales Activity

We purchased two office properties and one retail property for an aggregate contract purchase price of $232.5 million during the 2011 Quarter. These transactions are consistent with our stated acquisition strategy of focusing on properties inside the Washington metro region’s Beltway, near major transportation nodes and in areas with strong employment drivers and superior growth demographics.

On August 5, 2011, we executed five separate contracts with the same buyer for the sale of our industrial segment and two office properties (the “Industrial Portfolio”) for an aggregate sales price of $350.0 million. On September 2, 2011, we closed on the first three contracts, selling 15 industrial and two office properties for a $56.6 million gain on sale of real estate. Subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter, on October 3, 2011, we closed on the fourth contract for the sale of Northern Virginia Industrial Park II. On November 1, 2011, we closed on the final contract for 6100 Columbia Park Road and Dulles Business Park.

Capital Requirements

As of September 30, 2011, our unsecured lines of credit had $193.0 million in borrowings outstanding and $1.7 million in letters of credit issued, leaving a remaining borrowing capacity of $280.3 million.

We repaid without penalty during the 2011 Quarter the remaining $9.1 million on the mortgage note secured by Shady Grove Medical Village II and the remaining $2.7 million of our 3.875% convertible notes. Subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter,

 

22


Table of Contents

we prepaid the remaining $17.9 million principal balance on the mortgage notes secured by Dulles Business Park. We incurred $1.0 million in prepayment penalties, which were partially offset by an $875,000 increase in the sales price for the secured properties. We do not have any other notes that mature during the remainder of 2011.

 

23


Table of Contents

Significant Transactions

We summarize below our significant transactions during the 2011 and 2010 Periods:

2011 Period

 

   

The execution of five separate sale contracts for the disposition of our industrial segment and two office properties for a contract sales price of $350.0 million. We closed on the first three of the sale contracts during the 2011 Quarter, on September 2, 2011. We closed on the final two sale contracts subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter, on October 3, 2011 and November 1, 2011.

 

   

The disposition of Dulles Station, Phase I, a 180,000 square foot office building in Herndon, Virginia for a contract sales price of $58.8 million.

 

   

The acquisition of four office buildings for $301.8 million, adding approximately 882,000 square feet.

 

   

The acquisition of a retail property for $58.0 million, adding approximately 199,000 square feet.

 

   

The acquisition of approximately 37,000 square feet of land in Arlington, Virginia for $11.8 million through a consolidated joint venture of which WRIT is a 90% owner. The joint venture intends to develop a 150 unit mid-rise apartment community on this land.

 

   

The execution of an unsecured credit facility agreement that replaced and expanded Credit Facility No. 2 from $262.0 million to $400.0 million, with an accordion feature that allows us to increase the facility to $600.0 million, subject to additional lender commitments. The new unsecured line of credit matures on July 1, 2014 with a one-year extension option and currently bears an interest rate at LIBOR plus a margin of 122.5 basis points.

 

   

The execution of new leases for 0.8 million square feet of commercial space (excluding first generation leases at recently-built properties and properties sold or held for sale), with an average rental rate increase of 9.5% over expiring leases.

2010 Period

 

   

The acquisition of two office buildings for $68.0 million, adding approximately 271,000 square feet, which were 100% leased at the end of the 2010 Period.

 

   

The disposition of the Parklawn Portfolio, consisting of three office properties and one industrial property, for a contract sales price of $23.4 million and a gain on sale of $7.9 million.

 

   

The repurchase of $1.2 million of our 3.875% convertible notes at 99.3% of par, resulting in a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $41,600.

 

   

The issuance of 2.3 million common shares at a weighted average price of $29.60 under our sales agency financing agreement, raising $67.1 million in net proceeds.

 

   

The execution of new leases for 0.8 million square feet of commercial space (excluding first generation leases at recently-built properties and properties sold or held for sale), with an average rental rate increase of 12.6% over expiring leases.

Results of Operations

The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods. The ability to compare one period to another may be significantly affected by acquisitions completed and dispositions made during those periods. To provide more insight into our operating results, we divide our discussion into two main sections:

 

   

Consolidated Results of Operations: Overview analysis of results on a consolidated basis.

 

   

Net Operating Income (“NOI”): Detailed analysis of same-store and non-same-store NOI results by segment.

 

24


Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations

Real Estate Rental Revenue

Real estate rental revenue for properties classified as continuing operations is summarized as follows (all data in thousands except percentage amounts):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                 Change                 Change  
     2011     2010     $     %     2011     2010     $     %  

Minimum base rent

   $ 63,814      $ 57,596      $ 6,218        10.8   $ 188,183      $ 169,383      $ 18,800        11.1

Recoveries from tenants

     6,321        5,599        722        12.9     19,187        18,767        420        2.2

Provisions for doubtful accounts

     (1,220     (929     (291     31.3     (3,361     (3,139     (222     7.1

Lease termination fees

     175        38        137        360.5     287        320        (33     (10.3 )% 

Parking and other tenant charges

     2,841        2,728        113        4.1     8,523        7,795        728        9.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 71,931      $ 65,032      $ 6,899        10.6   $ 212,819      $ 193,126      $ 19,693        10.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Minimum Base Rent: Minimum base rent from acquisitions ($5.8 million) and a $0.5 million increase from same-store properties caused the $6.2 million increase in the 2011 Quarter. The same-store increase was primarily due to higher rental rates ($1.2 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($0.6 million).

Minimum base rent from acquisitions ($17.6 million) and a $1.2 million increase from same-store properties caused the $18.8 million increase in the 2011 Period. The same-store increase was primarily due to higher rental rates ($3.7 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($2.0 million) and higher amortization of capitalized lease incentives ($0.3 million).

Recoveries from Tenants: Recoveries from tenants increased by $0.7 million in the 2011 Quarter primarily due to acquisitions.

Recoveries from tenants increased by $0.4 million in the 2011 Period due to acquisitions ($1.5 million), partially offset by lower reimbursements for real estate taxes ($1.1 million) at same-store properties caused by lower property tax assessments.

Provisions for Doubtful Accounts: Provisions for doubtful accounts increased by $0.3 million in the 2011 Quarter due to higher provisions in the retail ($0.2 million) and office ($0.1 million) segments.

Provisions for doubtful accounts increased by $0.2 million in the 2011 Period due primarily to higher provisions in the retail ($0.7 million) and medical office ($0.2 million) segments, partially offset by lower provisions in the office segment ($0.6 million).

Lease Termination Fees: Lease termination fees increased by $0.1 million in the 2011 Quarter, primarily in the retail segment.

Parking and Other Tenant Charges: Parking and other tenant charges from acquisitions caused the $0.1 million increase in the 2011 Quarter.

Parking income from acquisitions ($0.4 million) and higher parking income ($0.2 million) and antenna rents ($0.1 million) from same-store properties caused the $0.7 million increase in parking and other tenant charges in the 2011 Period.

 

25


Table of Contents

A summary of occupancy for properties classified as continuing operations by segment follows:

 

     As September 30,  
     2011     2010     Change  

Office

     88.6     89.4     (0.8 )% 

Medical Office

     87.2     87.8     (0.6 )% 

Retail

     92.3     92.2     0.1

Multifamily

     94.0     96.4     (2.4 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     90.3     91.4     (1.1 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Occupancy represents occupied square footage indicated as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period.

A detailed discussion of occupancy by sector can be found in the NOI section.

 

26


Table of Contents

Real Estate Expenses

Real estate expenses for properties classified as continuing operations are summarized as follows (all data in thousands except percentage amounts):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                   Change                   Change  
     2011      2010      $     %     2011      2010      $      %  

Property operating expenses

   $ 17,679       $ 15,437       $ 2,242        14.5   $ 51,376       $ 46,466       $ 4,910         10.6

Real estate taxes

     6,391         6,475         (84     (1.3 )%      19,748         19,161         587         3.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 24,070       $ 21,912       $ 2,158        9.8   $ 71,124       $ 65,627       $ 5,497         8.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Real estate expenses as a percentage of revenue were 33.5% and 33.7% for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters, respectively, and 33.4% and 34.0% for the 2011 and 2010 Periods, respectively.

Property Operating Expenses: Property operating expenses include utilities, repairs and maintenance, property administration and management, operating services, common area maintenance, property insurance, bad debt and other operating expenses.

Property operating expenses from acquisitions ($1.2 million) and higher property administration and management ($0.4 million) and repairs and maintenance ($0.4 million) expenses at same-store properties primarily caused the $2.2 million increase in the 2011 Quarter.

Property operating expenses from acquisitions ($3.8 million) and higher repairs and maintenance ($0.5 million), administrative ($0.3 million) and legal ($0.1 million) costs at same-store properties primarily caused the $4.9 million increase in the 2011 Period.

Real Estate Taxes: Lower assessments on same-store properties ($0.8 million), offset by real estate taxes on acquisitions ($0.7 million) caused the $0.1 million decrease in the 2011 Quarter.

Real estate taxes on acquisitions ($2.1 million) offset by lower assessments on same-store properties ($1.6 million) caused the $0.6 million increase in the 2011 Period.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses are summarized as follows (all data in thousands except percentage amounts):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                   Change                   Change  
     2011      2010      $     %     2011      2010      $      %  

Depreciation and amortization

   $ 23,479       $ 20,224       $ 3,255        16.1   $ 67,899       $ 59,574       $ 8,325         14.0

Interest expense

     16,508         16,717         (209     (1.3 )%      50,266         49,662         604         1.2

Acquisition costs

     1,600         —           1,600        —       3,571         452         3,119         690.0

General and administrative

     3,837         3,141         696        22.2     11,588         10,455         1,133         10.8
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 45,424       $ 40,082       $ 5,342        13.3   $ 133,324       $ 120,143       $ 13,181         11.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense from acquisitions caused the $3.3 million increase in the 2011 Quarter.

Depreciation and amortization expense from acquisitions ($9.9 million), partially offset by lower depreciation and amortization expense at same-store properties ($1.6 million), caused the $8.3 million increase in the 2011 Period.

The lower depreciation and amortization expense at same-store properties is primarily due to lower amortization of intangible assets associated with the acquisition of properties.

 

27


Table of Contents

Interest Expense: A summary of interest expense by debt type for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods appears below (in millions, except percentage amounts):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                 Change                 Change  
     2011     2010     $     %     2011     2010     $     %  

Notes payable

     9.0        10.2        (1.2     (11.8 )%      29.9        30.7        (0.8     (2.6 )% 

Mortgages

     5.8        5.7        0.1        1.8     16.9        16.9        —          —  

Lines of credit/short-term note payable

     1.9        0.9        1.0        111.1     3.9        2.9        1.0        34.5

Capitalized interest

     (0.2     (0.1     (0.1     100.0     (0.4     (0.8     0.4        (50.0 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 16.5      $ 16.7      $ (0.2     (1.2 )%    $ 50.3      $ 49.7      $ 0.6        1.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Acquisition Costs: Acquisition costs increased by $1.6 million and $3.1 million for the 2011 Quarter and Period, respectively, due to the acquisitions of 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 1227 25th Street, Olney Village Center, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II during 2011.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expense increased by $0.7 million in the 2011 Quarter primarily due to severance associated with the Industrial Portfolio disposition ($0.5 million) and higher legal expenses ($0.1 million).

General and administrative expense increased by $1.1 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to new positions and annual salary increases ($0.9 million) and higher legal expenses ($0.2 million).

Discontinued Operations

We dispose of assets (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) that no longer meet our long-term strategy or return objectives and where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be reinvested into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs, or distributed to our shareholders.

Properties we sold during 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

 

Disposition Date   

Property

  

Type

   Rentable
Square Feet
     Contract
Sales Price
(In millions)
 

September 2, 2011

   Industrial Portfolio(1)    Office/Industrial      3,092,000       $ 350.0   

April 5, 2011

   Dulles Station, Phase I    Office      180,000       $ 58.8   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 
     

2011 Total

     3,272,000       $ 408.8   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

June 18, 2010

   Parklawn Portfolio (2)    Office/Industrial      229,000       $ 23.4   

December 21, 2010

   The Ridges    Office      104,000         27.5   

December 22, 2010

   Ammendale I&II and Amvax    Industrial      305,000         23.0   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 
     

2010 Total

     638,000       $ 73.9   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) 

The Industrial Portfolio consists of every property in our industrial segment and two office properties (the Crescent and Albemarle Point). On September 2, 2011 we closed on the sale of the industrial properties (8880 Gorman Road, Dulles South IV, Fullerton Business Center, Hampton Overlook, Alban Business Center, Pickett Industrial Park, Northern Virginia Industrial Park I, 270 Technology Park, Fullerton Industrial Center, Sully Square, 9950 Business Parkway, Hampton South and 8900 Telegraph Road) and two office properties (Crescent and Albemarle Point). We closed on the sales of the remaining properties in the Industrial Portfolio subsequent to the end of the 2011 Quarter.

(2)

The Parklawn Portfolio consists of three office properties (Parklawn Plaza, Lexington Building and Saratoga Building) and one industrial property (Charleston Business Center).

 

28


Table of Contents

Operating results of the properties classified as discontinued operations are summarized as follows (in thousands, except for percentages):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                 Change                 Change  
     2011     2010     $     %     2011     2010     $     %  

Revenues

   $ 6,597      $ 11,241      $ (4,644     (41.3 )%    $ 25,612      $ 36,410      $ (10,798     (29.7 )% 

Property expenses

     (1,768     (3,239     1,471        (45.4 )%      (7,564     (11,866     4,302        (36.3 )% 

Real estate impairment

     —          —          —          —       (599     —          (599     —     

Depreciation and amortization

     (943     (4,054     3,111        (76.7 )%      (7,231     (11,981     4,750        (39.6 )% 

Interest expense

     (231     (383     152        (39.7 )%      (696     (1,516     820        (54.1 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,655      $ 3,565      $ 90        2.5   $ 9,522      $ 11,047      $ (1,525     (13.8 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Operating Income

NOI is the primary performance measure we use to assess the results of our operations at the property level. We believe that NOI is useful as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations of trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. As a result of the foregoing, we provide NOI as a supplement to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. NOI does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. A reconciliation of NOI to net income follows.

 

29


Table of Contents

2011 Quarter Compared to 2010 Quarter

The following tables of selected operating data provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2011 Quarter compared to the 2010 Quarter. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010     $ Change      % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

         

Same-store

   $ 65,483      $ 65,018      $ 465         0.7

Non-same-store (1)

     6,448        14        6,434         45,957.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 71,931      $ 65,032      $ 6,899         10.6

Real Estate Expenses

         

Same-store

   $ 21,983      $ 21,776      $ 207         1.0

Non-same-store (1)

     2,087        136        1,951         1,434.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 24,070      $ 21,912      $ 2,158         9.8

NOI

         

Same-store

   $ 43,500      $ 43,242      $ 258         0.6

Non-same-store (1)

     4,361        (122     4,483         (3,674.6 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 47,861      $ 43,120      $ 4,741         11.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reconciliation to Net Income

         

NOI

   $ 47,861      $ 43,120        

Acquisition costs

     (1,600     —          

Other income

     270        289        

Interest expense

     (16,508     (16,717     

Gain from non-disposal activities

     —          4        

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

     —          (238     

Depreciation and amortization

     (23,479     (20,224     

General and administrative expenses

     (3,837     (3,141     

Discontinued operations:

         

Gain on sale of real estate

     56,639        —          

Income tax benefit (expense)

     35        —          

Income (loss) from operations of properties sold or held for sale (2)

     3,655        3,565        
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

Net income

     63,036        6,658        

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (28     (33     
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 63,008      $ 6,625        
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,  
Occupancy    2011     2010  

Same-store

     90.7     92.1

Non-same-store (1)

     87.9     5.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     90.3     91.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 Office acquisitions – 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 1227 25th Street, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II

2010 Retail acquisition – Gateway Overlook

2011 Retail acquisition – Olney Village Center

2009 Medical Office acquisition – Lansdowne Medical Office Building

 

30


Table of Contents
(2) 

Discontinued operations include gain on disposals and income from operations for:

2011 held for sale and sold – Dulles Station, Phase I and the Industrial Portfolio

2010 dispositions – Parklawn Plaza, Lexington Building, Saratoga Building, Charleston Business Center, the Ridges,

    Ammendale I&II and Amvax

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $0.5 million in the 2011 Quarter primarily due to higher rental rates ($1.2 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($0.6 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $0.2 million in the 2011 Quarter as higher operating expenses ($1.0 million) were offset by lower real estate taxes ($0.8 million).

The decrease in same-store occupancy was the result of difficulties in leasing vacant space across all segments. The increase in non-same-store occupancy reflects the acquisitions made during the 2011 Period and 2010. Lansdowne Medical Office Building, which was vacant upon acquisition in 2009, was 32.0% leased as of the end of the 2011 Quarter. During the 2011 Quarter, 56.9% of the commercial square footage expiring was renewed as compared to 38.2% in the 2010 Quarter, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2011 Quarter, we executed new leases (excluding first generation leases at recently-built properties) for 241,900 commercial square feet at an average rental rate of $33.71 per square foot, an increase of 11.7%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $24.44 per square foot.

An analysis of NOI by segment follows.

 

31


Table of Contents

Office Segment:

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

          

Same-store

   $ 31,306       $ 31,740       $ (434     (1.4 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     3,903         —           3,903     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 35,209       $ 31,740       $ 3,469        10.9

Real Estate Expenses

          

Same-store

   $ 10,748       $ 11,451       $ (703     (6.1 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     1,442         —           1,442     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 12,190       $ 11,451       $ 739        6.5

NOI

          

Same-store

   $ 20,558       $ 20,289       $ 269        1.3

Non-same-store (1)

     2,461         —           2,461     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 23,019       $ 20,289       $ 2,730        13.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Occupancy    2011     2010  

Same-store

     88.1     89.4

Non-same-store (1)

     90.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     88.6     89.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 acquisitions – 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 1227 25th Street, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties decreased by $0.4 million in the 2011 Quarter due to lower reimbursements for real estate taxes ($0.4 million) and lower occupancy ($0.2 million), partially offset by higher rental rates ($0.3 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $0.7 million due to lower real estate taxes ($0.9 million) partially offset by higher repairs and maintenance costs ($0.2 million).

The decrease in same-store occupancy was primarily due to lower occupancy at 2000 M Street and West Gude Drive, partially offset by higher occupancy at One Central Plaza. The non-same-store occupancy of 90.5% reflects high occupancy at 1140 Connecticut Avenue, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II, partially offset by 1227 25th Street, which was 71.9% occupied at the end of the 2011 Quarter. During the 2011 Quarter, 58.6% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 26.4% in the 2010 Quarter, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2011 Quarter, we executed new leases for 152,900 square feet of office space at an average rental rate of $39.53 per square foot, an increase of 9.7%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $23.96 per square foot.

 

32


Table of Contents

Medical Office Segment:

 

     Quarters Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010     $ Change      % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

          

Same-store

   $ 11,167       $ 10,979      $ 188         1.7

Non-same-store (1)

     184         14        170         1,214.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 11,351       $ 10,993      $ 358         3.3

Real Estate Expenses

          

Same-store

   $ 3,509       $ 3,499      $ 10         0.3

Non-same-store (1)

     147         136        11         8.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 3,656       $ 3,635      $ 21         0.6

NOI

          

Same-store

   $ 7,658       $ 7,480      $ 178         2.4

Non-same-store (1)

     37         (122     159         (130.3 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 7,695       $ 7,358      $ 337         4.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Occupancy    2011     2010  

Same-store

     91.3     93.3

Non-same-store (1)

     27.0     5.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     87.2     87.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2009 acquisition – Lansdowne Medical Office Building

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $0.2 million in 2011 Quarter due to higher rental rates ($0.3 million) and higher reimbursements for operating expenses ($0.1 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($0.2 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties slightly increased in the 2011 Quarter.

The decrease in same-store occupancy was driven by lower occupancy at Woodholme Medical Center, 9707 Medical Center Drive and 8301 Arlington Boulevard. The increase in non-same-store occupancy to 27.0% in the 2011 Quarter reflects the continued lease-up of Lansdowne Medical Office Building, which was newly-constructed and vacant when purchased during the fourth quarter of 2009. During the 2011 Quarter, 72.1% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 90.2% in the 2010 Quarter. During the 2011 Quarter, we executed new leases (excluding first generation leases) for 29,100 square feet of medical office space at an average rental rate of $37.76, an increase of 9.0%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $10.96 per square foot.

 

33


Table of Contents

Retail Segment:

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

          

Same-store

   $ 10,139       $ 9,865       $ 274        2.8

Non-same-store (1)

     2,361         —           2,361     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 12,500       $ 9,865       $ 2,635        26.7

Real Estate Expenses

          

Same-store

   $ 2,569       $ 2,028       $ 541        26.7

Non-same-store (1)

     498         —           498     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 3,067       $ 2,028       $ 1,039        51.2

NOI

          

Same-store

   $ 7,570       $ 7,837       $ (267     (3.4 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     1,863         —           1,863     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 9,433       $ 7,837       $ 1,596        20.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Occupancy    2011     2010  

Same-store

     91.8     92.2

Non-same-store (1)

     94.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     92.3     92.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 acquisition – Olney Village Center

2010 acquisition – Gateway Overlook

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $0.3 million in the 2011 Quarter due to higher rental rates ($0.1 million), higher reimbursements for common area maintenance ($0.2 million) and higher lease termination fees ($0.1 million), partially offset by higher reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.2 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $0.5 million in the 2011 Quarter primarily due to higher utilities ($0.1 million), common area maintenance ($0.1 million) and legal ($0.1 million) costs and real estate taxes ($0.1 million).

The decrease in same-store occupancy was driven by lower occupancy at the Centre at Hagerstown, partially offset by higher occupancy at Montgomery Village Center. The non-same-store occupancy of 94.7% reflects the acquisitions of Olney Village Center and Gateway Overlook. During the 2011 Quarter, 15.9% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 33.8% in the 2010 Quarter. During the 2011 Quarter, we executed new leases for 59,900 square feet of retail space at an average rental rate of $18.56, an increase of 31.3%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $32.19 per square foot.

 

34


Table of Contents

Multifamily Segment:

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change      % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

           

Total

   $ 12,871       $ 12,434       $ 437         3.5

Real Estate Expenses

           

Total

   $ 5,157       $ 4,798       $ 359         7.5

NOI

           

Total

   $ 7,714       $ 7,636       $ 78         1.0

 

Occupancy    2011     2010  

Total

     94.0     96.4

Real estate rental revenue increased by $0.4 million in the 2011 Quarter due primarily to higher rental rates ($0.5 million) and lower rent abatements ($0.1 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($0.2 million).

Real estate expenses increased by $0.4 million in the 2011 Quarter primarily due to higher property administration and management ($0.2 million) and utilities ($0.1 million) costs and real estate taxes ($0.1 million).

The decrease in occupancy was driven by lower occupancy at the Ashby at McLean and Bethesda Hill Apartments.

 

35


Table of Contents

2011 Period Compared to 2010 Period

The following tables of selected operating data provide the basis for our discussion of NOI in the 2011 Period compared to the 2010 Period. Occupancy data is not presented because the results are unchanged from the quarterly data presented in the previous section. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

        

Same-store

   $ 190,581      $ 190,291      $ 290        0.2

Non-same-store (1)

     22,238        2,835        19,403        684.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 212,819      $ 193,126      $ 19,693        10.2

Real Estate Expenses

        

Same-store

   $ 63,996      $ 64,508      $ (512     (0.8 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     7,128        1,119        6,009        537.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 71,124      $ 65,627      $ 5,497        8.4

NOI

        

Same-store

   $ 126,585      $ 125,783      $ 802        0.6

Non-same-store (1)

     15,110        1,716        13,394        780.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 141,695      $ 127,499      $ 14,196        11.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation to Net Income

        

NOI

   $ 141,695      $ 127,499       

Acquisition costs

     (3,571     (452    

Other income

     886        875       

Interest expense

     (50,266     (49,662    

Depreciation and amortization

     (67,899     (59,574    

General and administrative expenses

     (11,588     (10,455    

Gain from non-disposal activities

     —          4       

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

     —          (280    

Discontinued operations:

        

Gain on sale of real estate

     56,639        7,942       

Income tax expense on sale of real estate

     (1,138     —         

Income (loss) from operations of properties sold or held for sale (2)

     9,522        11,047       
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Net income

     74,280        26,944       

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (85     (109    
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 74,195      $ 26,835       
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 Office acquisitions – 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 1227 25th Street, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II

2010 Office acquisitions – Quantico Corporate Center (925 and 1000 Corporate Drive)

2011 Retail acquisition – Olney Village Center

2010 Retail acquisition – Gateway Overlook

2009 Medical Office acquisition – Lansdowne Medical Office Building

 

(2) 

Discontinued operations include gain on disposals and income from operations for:

2011 sold and held for sale – Dulles Station, Phase I and the Industrial Portfolio

2010 dispositions – Parklawn Plaza, Lexington Building, Saratoga Building, Charleston Business Center, the Ridges, Ammendale I&II and Amvax

 

36


Table of Contents

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $0.3 million in the 2011 Period due to higher rental rates ($3.7 million), offset by lower occupancy ($2.1 million), lower real estate tax reimbursements ($1.1 million) and higher reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.1 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $0.5 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to lower real estate taxes ($1.6 million), partially offset by higher property administration and management costs ($0.8 million) and repairs and maintenance costs ($0.5 million).

During the 2011 Period, 64.6% of the commercial square footage expiring was renewed as compared to 56.6% in the 2010 Period, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2011 Period, we executed new leases (excluding first generation leases at recently-built properties) for 762,200 commercial square feet at an average rental rate of $30.46 per square foot, an increase of 9.5%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $20.17 per square foot.

An analysis of NOI by segment follows.

 

37


Table of Contents

Office Segment:

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

          

Same-store

   $ 88,283       $ 89,863       $ (1,580     (1.8 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     15,577         2,810         12,767        454.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 103,860       $ 92,673       $ 11,187        12.1

Real Estate Expenses

          

Same-store

   $ 30,099       $ 31,403       $ (1,304     (4.2 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     5,206         732         4,474        611.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 35,305       $ 32,135       $ 3,170        9.9

NOI

          

Same-store

   $ 58,184       $ 58,460       $ (276     (0.5 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     10,371         2,078         8,293        399.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 68,555       $ 60,538       $ 8,017        13.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 acquisitions – 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 1227 25th Street, Braddock Metro Center and John Marshall II

2010 acquisitions – Quantico Corporate Center (925 and 1000 Corporate Drive)

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties decreased by $1.6 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to lower occupancy ($1.6 million), lower real estate tax reimbursements ($1.0 million) and higher rent abatements ($0.4 million), partially offset by higher rental rates ($0.9 million) and lower reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.6 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $1.3 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to lower real estate taxes ($1.6 million) partially offset by higher repairs and maintenance costs ($0.4 million).

During the 2011 Period, 52.7% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 43.2% in the 2010 Period, excluding properties sold or classified as held for sale. During the 2011 Period, we executed new leases for 451,300 square feet of office space at an average rental rate of $33.13 per square foot, an increase of 7.3%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $22.14 per square foot.

 

38


Table of Contents

Medical Office Segment:

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

        

Same-store

   $ 33,571      $ 33,670      $ (99     (0.3 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     431        25        406        1,624.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 34,002      $ 33,695      $ 307        0.9

Real Estate Expenses

        

Same-store

   $ 10,295      $ 10,803      $ (508     (4.7 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     452        387        65        16.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 10,747      $ 11,190      $ (443     (4.0 )% 

NOI

        

Same-store

   $ 23,276      $ 22,867      $ 409        1.8

Non-same-store (1)

     (21     (362     341        (94.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 23,255      $ 22,505      $ 750        3.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2009 acquisition – Lansdowne Medical Office Building

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties decreased by $0.1 million in 2011 Period due to lower occupancy ($0.6 million), higher reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.2 million) and lower operating expense ($0.2 million) and real estate tax ($0.2 million) reimbursements, partially offset by higher rental rates ($1.1 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties decreased by $0.5 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to recoveries of bad debt ($0.3 million) and lower real estate taxes ($0.1 million).

During the 2011 Period, 74.3% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 76.1% in the 2010 Period. During the 2011 Period, we executed new leases (excluding first generation leases) for 133,800 square feet of medical office space at an average rental rate of $36.84, an increase of 14.1%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $21.25 per square foot.

 

39


Table of Contents

Retail Segment:

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change     % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

          

Same-store

   $ 30,654       $ 30,566       $ 88        0.3

Non-same-store (1)

     6,230         —           6,230        N/A   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate rental revenue

   $ 36,884       $ 30,566       $ 6,318        20.7

Real Estate Expenses

          

Same-store

   $ 8,758       $ 7,877       $ 881        11.2

Non-same-store (1)

     1,470         —           1,470        N/A   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 10,228       $ 7,877       $ 2,351        29.8

NOI

          

Same-store

   $ 21,896       $ 22,689       $ (793     (3.5 )% 

Non-same-store (1)

     4,760         —           4,760        N/A   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total NOI

   $ 26,656       $ 22,689       $ 3,967        17.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Non-same-store properties include:

2011 acquisition – Olney Village Center

2010 acquisition – Gateway Overlook

Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties increased by $0.1 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to higher rental rates ($0.3 million), lease termination fees ($0.1 million), occupancy ($0.1 million) and real estate tax reimbursements ($0.1 million), offset by reserves for uncollectible revenue ($0.6 million).

Real estate expenses from same-store properties increased by $0.9 million in the 2011 Period primarily due to the write-off of receivables due to a large tenant bankruptcy at the Centre at Hagerstown ($0.7 million), higher legal fees ($0.1 million) and higher real estate taxes ($0.1 million).

During the 2011 Period, 85.2% of the square footage that expired was renewed compared to 70.1% in the 2010 Period. During the 2011 Period, we executed new leases for 177,100 square feet of retail space at an average rental rate of $19.23, an increase of 13.9%, with average tenant improvements and leasing costs of $14.35 per square foot.

 

40


Table of Contents

Multifamily Segment:

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      $ Change      % Change  

Real Estate Rental Revenue

           

Total

   $ 38,073       $ 36,192       $ 1,881         5.2

Real Estate Expenses

           

Total

   $ 14,844       $ 14,425       $ 419         2.9

NOI

           

Total

   $ 23,229       $ 21,767       $ 1,462         6.7

Real estate rental revenue increased by $1.9 million in the 2011 Period due primarily to higher rental rates ($1.3 million), lower rent abatements ($0.4 million) and higher parking income ($0.1 million).

Real estate expenses increased by $0.4 million in the 2011 Period due primarily to higher property administration and management costs ($0.3 million), repairs and maintenance costs ($0.1 million) and real estate taxes ($0.1 million).

 

41


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Structure

During 2011, we expect that we will have the following capital requirements. There can be no assurance that our capital requirements will not be materially higher or lower than these expectations.

 

   

Funding dividends on our common shares and noncontrolling interest distributions to third party unit holders;

 

   

All remaining 2011 maturities on our mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes payable have been paid;

 

   

Approximately $35.0 - $45.0 million to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets, including approximately $20.0 - $25.0 million to fund tenant-related capital requirements and leasing commissions;

 

   

Approximately $1.0 million to fund first generation tenant-related capital requirements and leasing commissions;

 

   

Approximately $25.0 - $30.0 million to invest in our development projects; and

 

   

Approximately $283.1 million, net of assumed mortgages, to fund our known property acquisitions, all of which closed in the 2011 Period.

Debt Financing

Our total debt at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     September 30, 2011      December 31, 2010  

Fixed rate mortgages

   $ 428,909       $ 361,860   

Unsecured credit facilities

     193,000         100,000   

Unsecured notes payable

     657,378         753,587   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 1,279,287       $ 1,215,447   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage Debt

At September 30, 2011, our $428.9 million in fixed rate mortgages, which includes a net $4.4 million in unamortized discounts due to fair value adjustments, bore an effective weighted average fair value interest rate of 5.9% and had a weighted average maturity of 4.7 years. We may either initiate secured mortgage debt or assume mortgage debt from time-to-time in conjunction with property acquisitions.

Unsecured Credit Facilities

Our primary external source of liquidity is our two revolving credit facilities.

Credit Facility No. 1 is a $75.0 million unsecured credit facility set to expire in June 2012. We had $74.0 million outstanding and $0.8 million in letters of credit issued as of September 30, 2011, related to Credit Facility No. 1. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at our option of LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating on our publicly issued debt or the higher of SunTrust Bank’s prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate in effect plus 0.5%. The interest rate spread is currently 42.5 basis points. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in June 2012. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. In addition, we pay a facility fee based on the credit rating of our publicly issued debt which currently equals 0.15% per annum of the $75.0 million committed capacity, without regard to usage. Rates and fees may be adjusted up or down based on changes in our senior unsecured credit ratings.

Credit Facility No. 2 is a $400.0 million unsecured credit facility expiring in July 2014. We had $119.0 million outstanding and $0.9 million in letters of credit issued as of September 30, 2011, related to Credit Facility No. 2. Advances under this agreement bear interest at our option of LIBOR plus a spread based on the credit rating of our publicly issued debt or the higher of Wells Fargo Bank’s prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate in effect on that day plus 0.5%. The interest rate spread is currently 122.5 basis points. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. Credit Facility No. 2 requires us to pay the lender a facility fee on the total commitment of 0.225% per annum. These fees are payable quarterly. All outstanding advances are due and payable upon maturity in July 2014 with a one-year extension option.

 

42


Table of Contents

An interest rate swap effectively fixes the interest rate on $100.0 million of the outstanding balance on our unsecured lines of credit at 2.845% through the interest rate swap’s maturity date of November 1, 2011.

Our unsecured credit facilities contain financial and other covenants with which we must comply. Some of these covenants include:

 

   

A minimum tangible net worth;

 

   

A maximum ratio of total liabilities to gross asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets;

 

   

A maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to gross asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets;

 

   

A minimum ratio of annual EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to fixed charges, including interest expense;

 

   

A minimum ratio of unencumbered asset value, calculated using a fair value of our assets, to unsecured indebtedness;

 

   

A minimum ratio of net operating income from our unencumbered properties to unsecured interest expense; and

 

   

A maximum ratio of permitted investments to gross asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets.

Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured credit facilities or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. This could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and would therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, our ability to draw on our unsecured credit facilities or incur other unsecured debt in the future could be restricted by the loan covenants. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our loan covenants.

There is a possibility that in the near term we may rely to a greater extent upon our unsecured credit facilities and potentially maintain balances on our unsecured credit facilities for longer periods than has been our historical practice. To the extent that we maintain larger balances on our unsecured credit facilities or maintain balances on our unsecured credit facilities for longer periods, adverse fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on earnings.

Unsecured Notes

We generally issue unsecured notes to fund our real estate assets long-term. In issuing future unsecured notes, we generally seek to ladder the maturities of our debt to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk in any particular future year.

Our unsecured notes have maturities ranging from May 2012 through February 2028, as follows (in thousands):

 

     September 30, 2011  
     Note Principal  

5.05% notes due 2012

   $ 50,000   

5.125% notes due 2013

     60,000   

5.25% notes due 2014

     100,000   

5.35% notes due 2015

     150,000   

4.95% notes due 2020

     250,000   

7.25% notes due 2028

     50,000   
  

 

 

 
   $ 660,000   
  

 

 

 

Our unsecured notes contain covenants with which we must comply. These include:

 

   

Limits on our total indebtedness;

 

   

Limits on our secured indebtedness;

 

   

Limits on our required debt service payments; and

 

   

Maintenance of a minimum level of unencumbered assets.

 

43


Table of Contents

Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured notes could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. This could cause our debt holders to accelerate the timing of payments and would therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our unsecured notes covenants.

We may from time to time seek to repurchase and cancel our outstanding notes through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Common Equity

We have authorized for issuance 100.0 million common shares, of which 66.1 million shares were outstanding at September 30, 2011.

We have a dividend reinvestment program, whereby shareholders may use their dividends and optional cash payments to purchase common shares. The common shares sold under this program may either be common shares issued by us or common shares purchased in the open market. We use net proceeds under this program for general corporate purposes. For the 2011 Period, we issued 125,484 common shares at a weighted average price of $30.71 per share, raising $3.8 million in net proceeds.

Dividends

We pay dividends quarterly. The maintenance of these dividends is subject to various factors, including the discretion of our Board of Trustees, our results of operations, the ability to pay dividends under Maryland law, the availability of cash to make the necessary dividend payments and the effect of REIT distribution requirements, which require at least 90% of our taxable income to be distributed to shareholders.

The table below details our dividend and distribution payments for the 2011 and 2010 Quarters and Periods (in thousands).

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
                   Change                   Change  
     2011      2010      $     %     2011      2010      $      %  

Common dividends

   $ 28,804       $ 27,647       $ 1,157        4.2   $ 86,190       $ 80,387       $ 5,803         7.2

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

     44         46         (2     (4.3 )%      151         137         14         10.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 28,848       $ 27,693       $ 1,155        4.2   $ 86,341       $ 80,524       $ 5,817         7.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Dividends paid for the 2011 Quarter and Period as compared to the 2010 Quarter and Period increased due primarily to the issuance of 5.6 million common shares under our sales agency financing agreement during 2010.

Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly, we may have to borrow on our lines of credit to sustain the dividend rate or reduce our dividend.

 

44


Table of Contents

Historical Cash Flows

Consolidated cash flow information is summarized as follows (in millions):

 

     Period Ended September 30,  
                 Change  
     2011     2010     $     %  

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   $ 86.4      $ 83.5      $ 2.9        3.5

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   $ (23.2   $ (61.8   $ 38.6        (62.5 )% 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   $ (101.2   $ 229.5      $ (330.7     (144.1 )% 

Our operating activities generated $86.4 million of net cash in the 2011 Period, an increase from $83.5 million in the 2010 Period that is primarily attributable the acquisitions made during 2011 and 2010, partially offset by dispositions and acquisition costs.

Our investing activities used net cash of $23.2 million in the 2011 Period compared to $61.8 million in the 2010 Period. The decrease in cash used by investing activities is primarily due proceeds from the first phase of the sale of the Industrial Portfolio, partially offset by a higher volume of acquisition activity during the 2011 Period.

Our financing activities used net cash of $101.2 million in the 2011 Period as compared to net cash provided of $229.5 million in the 2010 Period. The increase in cash used by financing activities is primarily due to the repayment of notes that matured during the 2011 Period, as well as proceeds from equity offerings during the 2010 Period.

Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Debt Service Coverage

The following table sets forth our ratios of earnings to fixed charges and debt service coverage for the periods shown:

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,      Period Ended September 30,  
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Earnings to fixed charges

     1.1x         1.2x         1.2x         1.1x   

Debt service coverage

     2.7x         2.7x         2.7x         2.6x   

We computed the ratio of earnings to fixed charges by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of income from continuing operations attributable to the controlling interests plus fixed charges, less capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortized costs of debt issuance, and interest costs capitalized.

We computed the debt service coverage ratio by dividing Adjusted EBITDA (which is earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, real estate impairment, gain on sale of real estate, gain/loss from the extinguishment of debt and gain/loss on non-disposal activities) by interest expense and principal amortization. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate for use in our debt service coverage ratio because it provides an estimate of the cash available to pay down long term debt. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to the controlling interests is in Exhibit 12 – Computation of Ratios.

Funds From Operations

FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for real estate companies. We provide FFO as a supplemental measure to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. Although FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for REITs, FFO does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. In addition, FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) defines FFO (April, 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) associated with sales of property plus real estate depreciation and amortization. We consider FFO to be a standard supplemental measure for REITs because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which historically assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that FFO more accurately provides investors an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and fund other needs. Our FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs. These other REITs may not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.

 

45


Table of Contents

The following table provides the calculation of our FFO and a reconciliation of FFO to net income for the periods shown (in thousands):

 

     Quarter Ended September 30,     Period Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net income attributable to the controlling interests

   $ 63,008      $ 6,625      $ 74,195      $ 26,835   

Adjustments:

        

Depreciation and amortization

     23,479        20,224        67,899        59,574   

Gain from non-disposal activities

     —          (4     —          (4

Discontinued operations:

        

Depreciation and amortization

     943        4,054        7,231        11,981   

Gain on sale of real estate

     (56,639     —          (56,639     (7,942

Income tax expense (benefit)

     (35     —          1,138        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO as defined by NAREIT

   $ 30,756      $ 30,899      $ 93,824      $ 90,444   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We base the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We discuss the most critical estimates in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011.

ITEM 3: QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The principal material financial market risk to which we are exposed is interest-rate risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to refinancing long-term fixed rate obligations, the opportunity cost of fixed rate obligations in a falling interest rate environment and our variable rate lines of credit. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs.

As the majority of our outstanding debt is long-term, fixed rate debt, our interest rate risk has not changed significantly from what was disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Financing.”

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Accounting concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There have been no changes in WRIT’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, WRIT’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

46


Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

None.

ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4: (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

47


Table of Contents

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS

 

48


Table of Contents
          Incorporated by Reference     

Exhibit

Number

  

Exhibit Description

  

Form

  

File

Number

  

Exhibit

    

Filing Date

  

Filed

Herewith

  10.37    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, for 8880 Gorman Road, Dulles South IV, Fullerton Business Center, Hampton Overlook and Alban Business Center.    8-K    001-06622      10.37       8/9/2011   
  10.38    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, for Pickett Industrial Park and Northern Virginia Industrial Park I.    8-K    001-06622      10.38       8/9/2011   
  10.39    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, for Albemarle Point, 270 Technology Park I, 270 Technology Park II, The Crescent, Fullerton Industrial Center, Sully Square, 9950 Business Parkway, Hampton South Phase I, Hampton South Phase II and 8900 Telegraph Road.    8-K    001-06622      10.39       8/9/2011   
  10.40    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, for Northern Virginia Industrial Park II.    8-K    001-06622      10.40       8/9/2011   

 

49


Table of Contents
  10.41    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, for 6100 Colombia Park Road, Dulles Business Park I and Dulles Business Park II.    8-K    001-06622      10.41       8/9/2011   
  10.42    First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2011, for 6100 Columbia Park Road, Dulles Business Park I and Dulles Business Park II.    8-K/A    001-06622      10.42       10/6/2011   
  12    Computation of Ratios                X
  31.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”)                X
  31.2    Certification of the Executive Vice President – Accounting and Administration pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act                X
  31.3    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act                X

 

50


Table of Contents
  32    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President – Accounting and Administration and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                X
101    The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10–Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) notes to these consolidated financial statements                X

 

51


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

 

/s/ George F. McKenzie

  George F. McKenzie
  President and Chief Executive Officer
 

/s/ Laura M. Franklin

  Laura M. Franklin
 

Executive Vice President

Accounting, Administration and Corporate Secretary

 

/s/ William T. Camp

  William T. Camp
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

DATE: November 8, 2011

 

52